Julia StusekvsMartina Trevisan
MTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Under 2.5 sets 2/10 models |
Julia Stusek 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
54%
Over 2.5 |
58%
Julia Stusek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 Both Stusek and Trevisan are capable players without extreme dominance on hard courts, suggesting competitive baseline rallies. Trevisan's c...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Julia Stusek Both players are mid-ranking WTA competitors with inconsistent form. Stusek has shown slightly better indoor hard-court performance historic... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
under 2.5 |
62%
Martina Trevisan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 2.5 Trevisan's superior consistency on clay should produce a straight-sets win. The surface rewards baseline control and limits upsets from lowe...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan holds far more professional experience and clay-court results than the unproven Julia Stusek. Training data through 2024 sh... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Under 2.5 sets |
65%
Martina Trevisan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 sets Given Trevisan's expected H2H win and her ability to control matches on clay, a straight-sets victory is a strong possibility. While Stusek...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan is a proven clay-court specialist with Grand Slam semi-final experience, offering a significant advantage over the younger... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Martina Trevisan |
55%
Julia Stusek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Martina Trevisan Given that Julia Stusek is the slight favorite and Martina Trevisan can be inconsistent, this match is likely to be competitive but ultimate...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Julia Stusek Julia Stusek is a rising young player with considerable potential, and Martina Trevisan, while experienced, has shown inconsistency. Based o... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Under 2.5 sets |
65%
Julia Stusek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 sets Based on Stusek's recent form and Trevisan's inconsistency, it is plausible that Stusek wins in straight sets. However, Trevisan may put up...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Julia Stusek Training data through 2025-09: Julia Stusek is a rising talent with strong recent ITF results, while Martina Trevisan has been struggling wi... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 sets 2/10
Both Stusek and Trevisan are capable players without extreme dominance on hard courts, suggesting competitive baseline rallies. Trevisan's c...
Trevisan's superior consistency on clay should produce a straight-sets win. The surface rewards baseline control and limits upsets from lowe...
Given Trevisan's expected H2H win and her ability to control matches on clay, a straight-sets victory is a strong possibility. While Stusek...
Given that Julia Stusek is the slight favorite and Martina Trevisan can be inconsistent, this match is likely to be competitive but ultimate...
Based on Stusek's recent form and Trevisan's inconsistency, it is plausible that Stusek wins in straight sets. However, Trevisan may put up...
Match winner
ConsensusJulia Stusek 3/5
Both players are mid-ranking WTA competitors with inconsistent form. Stusek has shown slightly better indoor hard-court performance historic...
Martina Trevisan holds far more professional experience and clay-court results than the unproven Julia Stusek. Training data through 2024 sh...
Martina Trevisan is a proven clay-court specialist with Grand Slam semi-final experience, offering a significant advantage over the younger...
Julia Stusek is a rising young player with considerable potential, and Martina Trevisan, while experienced, has shown inconsistency. Based o...
Training data through 2025-09: Julia Stusek is a rising talent with strong recent ITF results, while Martina Trevisan has been struggling wi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Martina Trevisan
DeepSeek V3
Julia Stusek
Grok 4 Fast
Martina Trevisan
Claude Haiku 4.5
Julia Stusek
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Julia Stusek
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b6e1ef65f978e75b…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 6 · 13:50 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 37766,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-06T13:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 06 Sep 2026 13:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Martina Trevisan",
"home": "Julia Stusek"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.