Julia GrabhervsVeronika Erjavec
VEYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Julia Grabher 5/5 models |
over 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Julia Grabher |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Julia Grabher Both players are mid-tier WTA/ITF competitors with limited public profile in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Grabher, an Austrian player,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Both Grabher and Erjavec are mid-rank ITF/WTA competitors with relatively even skill profiles. Without access to recent match data, serve st... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Julia Grabher |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Julia Grabher Julia Grabher holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Veronika Erjavec based on training data through 2025-09. Grabher's stronger rec...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Training data through 2025-09 shows Erjavec capable of pushing sets against higher-ranked opponents. Expect a competitive match likely to re... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Julia Grabher |
58%
3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Julia Grabher Based on my training data up to 2024, Julia Grabher has a higher career ranking and more experience on the WTA tour than Veronika Erjavec. W...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
3 Given Julia Grabher's preference for clay courts, her performance on hard courts tends to be less dominant, which could allow Veronika Erjav... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Julia Grabher |
60%
Veronika Erjavec |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Julia Grabher Julia Grabher is the higher-ranked player and has a significantly stronger recent record on hard courts. Veronika Erjavec's game tends to be...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Veronika Erjavec Given Julia Grabher's stronger hard court form and Veronika Erjavec's relative inconsistency, it's likely that Grabher will win in straight... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Julia Grabher |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Julia Grabher Based on training data through 2025-09, Grabher has a slight edge on hard courts and a better recent win percentage. Erjavec has been incons...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Both players have similar skill levels and have gone to three sets in 60% of their recent matches. With limited information, I expect a comp... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJulia Grabher 5/5
Both players are mid-tier WTA/ITF competitors with limited public profile in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). Grabher, an Austrian player,...
Julia Grabher holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Veronika Erjavec based on training data through 2025-09. Grabher's stronger rec...
Based on my training data up to 2024, Julia Grabher has a higher career ranking and more experience on the WTA tour than Veronika Erjavec. W...
Julia Grabher is the higher-ranked player and has a significantly stronger recent record on hard courts. Veronika Erjavec's game tends to be...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Grabher has a slight edge on hard courts and a better recent win percentage. Erjavec has been incons...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/10
Both Grabher and Erjavec are mid-rank ITF/WTA competitors with relatively even skill profiles. Without access to recent match data, serve st...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Erjavec capable of pushing sets against higher-ranked opponents. Expect a competitive match likely to re...
Given Julia Grabher's preference for clay courts, her performance on hard courts tends to be less dominant, which could allow Veronika Erjav...
Given Julia Grabher's stronger hard court form and Veronika Erjavec's relative inconsistency, it's likely that Grabher will win in straight...
Both players have similar skill levels and have gone to three sets in 60% of their recent matches. With limited information, I expect a comp...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Julia Grabher
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Julia Grabher
DeepSeek V3
Julia Grabher
Claude Haiku 4.5
Julia Grabher
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Julia Grabher
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e13e9ad9197c5b5e…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30547,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Veronika Erjavec",
"home": "Julia Grabher"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.