Joel Josef SchwaerzlervsAndrea Guerrieri
AGAI predictions
2 markets · 7 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 2/14 models |
Joel Josef Schwaerzler 7/7 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Qualifier matches at the US Open frequently go to 3 sets due to competitive parity among lower-ranked players and the best-of-3 format. Neit...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler Both players are lower-ranked ATP/challenger-level competitors; Schwaerzler competes primarily on the European circuit and has shown modest... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under 2.5 |
68%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Qualifier matches at US Open are best of three and Schwaerzler's serve should limit breaks. Both players lack deep main-draw experience so s...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler Schwaerzler holds a higher junior ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2025. Guerrieri shows inconsistent form agains... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Under 3.5 sets |
75%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 sets Given the projected skill disparity, Joel Schwaerzler is expected to secure a relatively comfortable victory. This likely means the match wi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler This prediction is based on general tennis knowledge from my training data through early 2024, as live data for a 2026 match is unavailable.... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Andrea Guerrieri |
60%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Andrea Guerrieri Given the close ranking and likely competitive nature of this match between two players from lower tiers, it is probable that the match will...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler Joel Josef Schwaerzler and Andrea Guerrieri are closely ranked players with similar career highs, primarily competing on the ITF circuit. Sc...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
over_37.5 |
70%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_37.5 With likely four sets and tight games, the total games should exceed 37.5. Both players have decent serves, leading to more tiebreaks and cl...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Joel Josef Schwaerzler Based on training data through 2025-09, Schwaerzler has shown stronger results on hard courts and a higher ranking. Guerrieri has struggled... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/14
Qualifier matches at the US Open frequently go to 3 sets due to competitive parity among lower-ranked players and the best-of-3 format. Neit...
Qualifier matches at US Open are best of three and Schwaerzler's serve should limit breaks. Both players lack deep main-draw experience so s...
Given the projected skill disparity, Joel Schwaerzler is expected to secure a relatively comfortable victory. This likely means the match wi...
Given the close ranking and likely competitive nature of this match between two players from lower tiers, it is probable that the match will...
With likely four sets and tight games, the total games should exceed 37.5. Both players have decent serves, leading to more tiebreaks and cl...
Match winner
ConsensusJoel Josef Schwaerzler 7/7
Both players are lower-ranked ATP/challenger-level competitors; Schwaerzler competes primarily on the European circuit and has shown modest...
Schwaerzler holds a higher junior ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts entering 2025. Guerrieri shows inconsistent form agains...
This prediction is based on general tennis knowledge from my training data through early 2024, as live data for a 2026 match is unavailable....
Joel Josef Schwaerzler and Andrea Guerrieri are closely ranked players with similar career highs, primarily competing on the ITF circuit. Sc...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Schwaerzler has shown stronger results on hard courts and a higher ranking. Guerrieri has struggled...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Claude Opus 4.7
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
DeepSeek V3
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Grok 4 Fast
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Claude Opus 4.6
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Claude Haiku 4.5
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Joel Josef Schwaerzler
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a5c781c9f4026540…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31106,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Andrea Guerrieri",
"home": "Joel Josef Schwaerzler"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
6 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
9 tool calls · 8 sources
8 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.