Joanna GarlandvsPriscilla Hon
PHAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Priscilla Hon 2/5 models |
Over 1.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Joanna Garland |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Joanna Garland Both players are relatively young prospects competing at the US Open hard court. Garland appears to have a slight edge in recent development...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 This match between two developing players is likely to be competitive rather than a blowout. Neither has dominant tour credentials that woul... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Priscilla Hon |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Priscilla Hon Based on training data through 2023-09 with no live access for 2026. Priscilla Hon holds a higher career ranking and stronger hard-court res...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Based on training data through 2023-09 with no live access for 2026. Both players lack elite return games, leading to shorter matches on har... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Priscilla Hon |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Priscilla Hon Based on historical career data available in my training set (up to my last update), Priscilla Hon has generally competed at a slightly high...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Given the relatively close skill levels of both players based on their career trajectories (as per my training data), a competitive match ex... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Garland |
60%
Priscilla Hon |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Garland Based on training data, Joanna Garland has historically shown a stronger performance on hard courts compared to Priscilla Hon. Garland's agg...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Priscilla Hon Given Garland's advantage on hard courts and Hon's potential to put up a fight, this match is likely to be closely contested. A two-set vict... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Joanna Garland |
60%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Joanna Garland Training data through 2025-09: Joanna Garland has been more consistent on hard courts and holds a stronger serve, which is crucial on the US...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over 2.5 Given the competitive nature of early-round US Open matches, it's likely that both players will win at least one set. Garland is the stronge... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusPriscilla Hon 2/5
Both players are relatively young prospects competing at the US Open hard court. Garland appears to have a slight edge in recent development...
Based on training data through 2023-09 with no live access for 2026. Priscilla Hon holds a higher career ranking and stronger hard-court res...
Based on historical career data available in my training set (up to my last update), Priscilla Hon has generally competed at a slightly high...
Based on training data, Joanna Garland has historically shown a stronger performance on hard courts compared to Priscilla Hon. Garland's agg...
Training data through 2025-09: Joanna Garland has been more consistent on hard courts and holds a stronger serve, which is crucial on the US...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 1/10
This match between two developing players is likely to be competitive rather than a blowout. Neither has dominant tour credentials that woul...
Based on training data through 2023-09 with no live access for 2026. Both players lack elite return games, leading to shorter matches on har...
Given the relatively close skill levels of both players based on their career trajectories (as per my training data), a competitive match ex...
Given Garland's advantage on hard courts and Hon's potential to put up a fight, this match is likely to be closely contested. A two-set vict...
Given the competitive nature of early-round US Open matches, it's likely that both players will win at least one set. Garland is the stronge...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Garland
DeepSeek V3
Joanna Garland
Claude Haiku 4.5
Joanna Garland
Grok 4 Fast
Priscilla Hon
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Priscilla Hon
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
94e0d8ec58a425b5…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 22:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31172,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Priscilla Hon",
"home": "Joanna Garland"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.