J.J. WolfvsAlexander Bublik
ABAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alexander Bublik 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alexander Bublik |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alexander Bublik Bublik has historically shown stronger hard-court performance and a more aggressive baseline game that translates well to US Open conditions...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are capable of taking sets off top opposition in a best-of-5 format. Wolf's grinding baseline style and recent improvements mea... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Alexander Bublik |
55%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alexander Bublik Bublik holds the higher ceiling and better hard-court results in recent seasons against Wolf's baseline style. US Open hard courts reward Bu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 3.5 Wolf can push sets deep with his consistency while Bublik's inconsistency often leads to extended matches on outdoor hard. Best-of-five form... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Alexander Bublik |
65%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Alexander Bublik Based on my training data up to its last update (prior to 2026-08-30), Alexander Bublik's unpredictable style and powerful serve often give...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Considering this is a best-of-five format at the US Open, and given the profiles of both players, a straight-sets victory for either seems u... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Alexander Bublik |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Alexander Bublik Alexander Bublik has a more established career on the ATP tour and generally performs better on hard courts compared to J.J. Wolf. Bublik's...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both players have capable serves, which can lead to closely contested sets. While Bublik is the favorite, Wolf has shown the ability to push...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
J.J. Wolf |
58%
under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
J.J. Wolf Training data through 2025-09: Wolf is a solid hard-court player with reliable baseline game, while Bublik is erratic and prone to unforced...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under 4.5 Based on training knowledge through 2025-09, both players have strong serves but are inconsistent in longer rallies; this match is likely to... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlexander Bublik 4/5
Bublik has historically shown stronger hard-court performance and a more aggressive baseline game that translates well to US Open conditions...
Bublik holds the higher ceiling and better hard-court results in recent seasons against Wolf's baseline style. US Open hard courts reward Bu...
Based on my training data up to its last update (prior to 2026-08-30), Alexander Bublik's unpredictable style and powerful serve often give...
Alexander Bublik has a more established career on the ATP tour and generally performs better on hard courts compared to J.J. Wolf. Bublik's...
Training data through 2025-09: Wolf is a solid hard-court player with reliable baseline game, while Bublik is erratic and prone to unforced...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Both players are capable of taking sets off top opposition in a best-of-5 format. Wolf's grinding baseline style and recent improvements mea...
Wolf can push sets deep with his consistency while Bublik's inconsistency often leads to extended matches on outdoor hard. Best-of-five form...
Considering this is a best-of-five format at the US Open, and given the profiles of both players, a straight-sets victory for either seems u...
Both players have capable serves, which can lead to closely contested sets. While Bublik is the favorite, Wolf has shown the ability to push...
Based on training knowledge through 2025-09, both players have strong serves but are inconsistent in longer rallies; this match is likely to...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Alexander Bublik
Grok 4 Fast
Alexander Bublik
DeepSeek V3
J.J. Wolf
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alexander Bublik
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alexander Bublik
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cd89f1de9089af37…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 01:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31715,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alexander Bublik",
"home": "J.J. Wolf"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.