Jenson BrooksbyvsJaime Faria
JFAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jenson Brooksby 5/5 models |
over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Jenson Brooksby |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Jenson Brooksby Brooksby is a ranked ATP player with established US Open hard-court experience and a more developed game against top-tier competition; Faria...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Given Brooksby's higher ranking and Faria's likely underdog status, a straight 2–0 or 3–0 victory for Brooksby is plausible. However, at a G... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Jenson Brooksby |
71%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jenson Brooksby Brooksby holds more Grand Slam experience and home-soil comfort on hard courts despite limited recent activity. Faria remains unproven in be...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
over 2.5 Both players lack dominant serve stats that produce routine straight-set wins at this level. Best-of-five format plus Faria's baseline game... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Jenson Brooksby |
45%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Jenson Brooksby Jenson Brooksby, based on his historical ATP tour performance on hard courts, is a significantly more accomplished player than Jaime Faria....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
45%
4 sets While Jenson Brooksby is the clear favorite, Jaime Faria, playing in a Grand Slam, is expected to show resilience and fight for every game,... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Jenson Brooksby |
70%
Jaime Faria |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Jenson Brooksby Jenson Brooksby is significantly higher ranked and has a much stronger record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Jaime Fa...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Jaime Faria Brooksby is expected to win comfortably in straight sets given the disparity in their rankings and hard court performance. While Faria may o...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Jenson Brooksby |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Jenson Brooksby Based on training data through 2025-09, Brooksby has a higher hard-court pedigree and more experience in Grand Slam main draws, while Faria...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Given the competitive nature of early-round Grand Slam matches and the contrasting styles, this match is likely to extend beyond three sets.... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJenson Brooksby 5/5
Brooksby is a ranked ATP player with established US Open hard-court experience and a more developed game against top-tier competition; Faria...
Brooksby holds more Grand Slam experience and home-soil comfort on hard courts despite limited recent activity. Faria remains unproven in be...
Jenson Brooksby, based on his historical ATP tour performance on hard courts, is a significantly more accomplished player than Jaime Faria....
Jenson Brooksby is significantly higher ranked and has a much stronger record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Jaime Fa...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Brooksby has a higher hard-court pedigree and more experience in Grand Slam main draws, while Faria...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2.5 1/10
Given Brooksby's higher ranking and Faria's likely underdog status, a straight 2–0 or 3–0 victory for Brooksby is plausible. However, at a G...
Both players lack dominant serve stats that produce routine straight-set wins at this level. Best-of-five format plus Faria's baseline game...
While Jenson Brooksby is the clear favorite, Jaime Faria, playing in a Grand Slam, is expected to show resilience and fight for every game,...
Brooksby is expected to win comfortably in straight sets given the disparity in their rankings and hard court performance. While Faria may o...
Given the competitive nature of early-round Grand Slam matches and the contrasting styles, this match is likely to extend beyond three sets....
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jenson Brooksby
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jenson Brooksby
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jenson Brooksby
DeepSeek V3
Jenson Brooksby
Grok 4 Fast
Jenson Brooksby
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
060aa1a29c5d24b4…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31721,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jaime Faria",
"home": "Jenson Brooksby"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.