Jenson BrooksbyvsGiovanni Mpetshi Perricard
GMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jenson Brooksby 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Jenson Brooksby |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jenson Brooksby Brooksby is the more established American hard-court player with consistent results on the ATP tour, while Perricard is a rising but less pr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players possess strong serve games, which typically produce longer rallies and tighter set margins on hard courts. Brooksby's defensive... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
62%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Perricard possesses a significantly more powerful serve and better recent results on hard courts than Brooksby, who has dealt with extended...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 2.5 Perricard's serve can dominate but Brooksby is capable of holding serve in patches, increasing the chance of a competitive set. Hard-court m... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Jenson Brooksby |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jenson Brooksby Based on training data through my last update, Jenson Brooksby's defensive consistency and counter-punching style typically fare well on har...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Brooksby's matches frequently go to three sets due to his grinding style and ability to push points, often making it difficult for opponents... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Jenson Brooksby |
58%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Jenson Brooksby Jenson Brooksby has a stronger ATP tour pedigree and has performed better at higher levels, including reaching an ATP Masters 1000 final. Wh...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard While Brooksby is the slight favorite, Mpetshi Perricard has the power to push sets to their limit. Given both players' capabilities to win...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Jenson Brooksby |
60%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Jenson Brooksby Training data through 2025-09 suggests Brooksby has a more complete baseline game and return ability, which tends to trouble big servers lik...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_2.5 Given both players' serving strengths and the likely tiebreak-heavy nature of their hard-court meeting, a competitive three-set match is pro... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJenson Brooksby 4/5
Brooksby is the more established American hard-court player with consistent results on the ATP tour, while Perricard is a rising but less pr...
Perricard possesses a significantly more powerful serve and better recent results on hard courts than Brooksby, who has dealt with extended...
Based on training data through my last update, Jenson Brooksby's defensive consistency and counter-punching style typically fare well on har...
Jenson Brooksby has a stronger ATP tour pedigree and has performed better at higher levels, including reaching an ATP Masters 1000 final. Wh...
Training data through 2025-09 suggests Brooksby has a more complete baseline game and return ability, which tends to trouble big servers lik...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both players possess strong serve games, which typically produce longer rallies and tighter set margins on hard courts. Brooksby's defensive...
Perricard's serve can dominate but Brooksby is capable of holding serve in patches, increasing the chance of a competitive set. Hard-court m...
Brooksby's matches frequently go to three sets due to his grinding style and ability to push points, often making it difficult for opponents...
While Brooksby is the slight favorite, Mpetshi Perricard has the power to push sets to their limit. Given both players' capabilities to win...
Given both players' serving strengths and the likely tiebreak-heavy nature of their hard-court meeting, a competitive three-set match is pro...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jenson Brooksby
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jenson Brooksby
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jenson Brooksby
DeepSeek V3
Jenson Brooksby
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
99cca259f481ae4d…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29759,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard",
"home": "Jenson Brooksby"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.