Jennifer RuggerivsMartina Trevisan
MTAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Martina Trevisan 4/5 models |
Over 1.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Martina Trevisan |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan is a more established WTA player with consistent top-100 ranking and proven clay-court pedigree, while Jennifer Ruggeri is...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 Both players are ITF/WTA level competitors, making a one-set blowout less likely than a competitive two-set match. Trevisan's experience sho... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Martina Trevisan |
71%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan is a far more experienced WTA player than Jennifer Ruggeri, who is a low-ranked junior-level competitor. Trevisan's superio...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
under 2.5 The large gap in class makes a straight-sets win for Trevisan the most probable outcome. Ruggeri lacks the weapons to force a deciding set a... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Martina Trevisan |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player, especially on clay courts, which this tournament is assumed t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Trevisan's clear advantage on clay and Ruggeri's relative inexperience against top-tier opponents, a straight-sets victory for Trevisa... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
62%
Jennifer Ruggeri |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jennifer Ruggeri Jennifer Ruggeri is a more established player on the WTA tour with a higher career-high ranking than Martina Trevisan. Ruggeri's consistent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given the slight favorite status of Ruggeri and the potential for Trevisan to challenge, this match is likely to go to three sets. Both play... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Martina Trevisan |
65%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Martina Trevisan Based on my training data through early 2025, Martina Trevisan is a top-100 level player with extensive WTA experience on clay, while Jennif...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 1.5 Given the expected clay-court encounter, matches often feature longer rallies and multiple breaks, making straight-set wins less frequent, e... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMartina Trevisan 4/5
Martina Trevisan is a more established WTA player with consistent top-100 ranking and proven clay-court pedigree, while Jennifer Ruggeri is...
Martina Trevisan is a far more experienced WTA player than Jennifer Ruggeri, who is a low-ranked junior-level competitor. Trevisan's superio...
Martina Trevisan is a significantly higher-ranked and more experienced player, especially on clay courts, which this tournament is assumed t...
Jennifer Ruggeri is a more established player on the WTA tour with a higher career-high ranking than Martina Trevisan. Ruggeri's consistent...
Based on my training data through early 2025, Martina Trevisan is a top-100 level player with extensive WTA experience on clay, while Jennif...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 2/10
Both players are ITF/WTA level competitors, making a one-set blowout less likely than a competitive two-set match. Trevisan's experience sho...
The large gap in class makes a straight-sets win for Trevisan the most probable outcome. Ruggeri lacks the weapons to force a deciding set a...
Given Trevisan's clear advantage on clay and Ruggeri's relative inexperience against top-tier opponents, a straight-sets victory for Trevisa...
Given the slight favorite status of Ruggeri and the potential for Trevisan to challenge, this match is likely to go to three sets. Both play...
Given the expected clay-court encounter, matches often feature longer rallies and multiple breaks, making straight-set wins less frequent, e...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Martina Trevisan
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Martina Trevisan
DeepSeek V3
Martina Trevisan
Claude Haiku 4.5
Martina Trevisan
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jennifer Ruggeri
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6e53cbee01e53eb9…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 18:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39182,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T16:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Martina Trevisan",
"home": "Jennifer Ruggeri"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.