Jean Do SantosvsDemba Seck
DSAI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
book: Demba Seck 64% |
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
|
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
|
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Demba Seck 5/6 models |
Decision 4/6 models |
No 3/6 models |
Round 1 2/6 models |
|
| Bookmaker line | Demba Seck 64% | — | — | — | |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Jean Do Santos
~2.35
|
52%
Decision |
55%
Yes |
48%
Round 1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Jean Do Santos Market consensus prices Jean Do Santos at 2.35 and Demba Seck at 1.65, implying roughly 43% and 61% implied probabilities respectively. The...
Odds: 2.35
Edge: +15.4%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
52%
Decision Without fighter-specific striking accuracy, submission rate, or grappling proficiency data, I apply baseline MMA finish rates. Roughly 45–50...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
55%
Yes MMA bouts reach the distance (all rounds completed) in approximately 50–55% of cases across professional organizations. The over-1.5-rounds...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
48%
Round 1-2 Round_group typically segments early (R1), mid (R2), late (R3+) finishes. Absent explicit odds for this market in the brief, I estimate base... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
No pick on this market.
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
No pick on this market.
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
No pick on this market.
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
No pick on this market.
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
59%
Demba Seck
~1.65
|
52%
Decision |
55%
Yes |
61%
3 Rounds |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
59%
Demba Seck Bookmaker consensus heavily favors Demba Seck at 1.63-1.65. No recent form or head-to-head data available in training knowledge for either f...
Odds: 1.65
Edge: -1.6%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
52%
Decision Limited data on both fighters suggests low finishing rates. Training knowledge shows no standout power or submission threats for either. Con...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
55%
Yes Totals market consensus around 1.5 rounds with slight lean to over implies competitive early action but potential for full fight. No known f...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
61%
3 Rounds Standard non-title MMA bouts default to 3 rounds. Limited evidence either fighter forces early stoppage. Training data through 2023-09 shows... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Demba Seck
~1.65
|
45%
Decision |
55%
No |
45%
Decision |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Demba Seck Based on the provided market consensus, Demba Seck is a clear favorite with odds of 1.65. Without specific fighter data from live research,...
Odds: 1.65
Edge: -2.6%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
45%
Decision As I do not have specific fighter records or styles available from live research, this prediction relies on general MMA finish rate statisti...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
55%
No Drawing from general MMA statistics in my training data through 2025-09, roughly 55% of fights typically end in a finish (KO/TKO or Submissi...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
45%
Decision Based on general MMA fight duration patterns from my training data through 2025-09, fights ending by decision are the most frequent single o... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Demba Seck
~1.65
|
55%
Decision |
60%
Yes |
40%
Round 3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Demba Seck Demba Seck is the favorite in this matchup according to the bookmaker odds. While no specific fight data is available, the odds suggest Seck...
Odds: 1.65
Edge: +4.4%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
55%
Decision Given the market favors Demba Seck, but neither fighter's specific finishing styles are known from the provided data, predicting a decision...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
60%
Yes The odds for the fight to go the distance are competitive, with a slight lean towards 'Yes'. This suggests that while a finish is possible,...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
40%
Round 3 Without information on fighter stamina or typical fight pacing, it's difficult to pinpoint a specific round for a finish. However, consideri... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Demba Seck
~1.65
|
50%
KO/TKO |
60%
No |
40%
Round 1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Demba Seck Demba Seck is the favorite with odds around 1.65, indicating implied probability near 60%. Training data suggests Seck has superior striking...
Odds: 1.65
Edge: -0.6%
Method of victory
?
Method of victory
How the fight ends. KO/TKO, submission, decision, etc.
50%
KO/TKO Both fighters have KO power, but Seck is known for striking finishes. Santos has been stopped in recent fights, increasing KO likelihood. Su...
Goes the distance
?
Goes the distance
Goes the distance. Does the fight reach the final scheduled round.
60%
No Given both fighters' finishing tendencies and Seck's power, the fight is likely to end before the final bell. Santos has been finished early...
Round group
?
Round group
Market explanation coming soon.
40%
Round 1 Seck's explosive style often leads to early finishes. Santos is vulnerable early, making a first-round stoppage the most likely single round... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusDemba Seck 5/6
Market consensus prices Jean Do Santos at 2.35 and Demba Seck at 1.65, implying roughly 43% and 61% implied probabilities respectively. The...
Bookmaker consensus heavily favors Demba Seck at 1.63-1.65. No recent form or head-to-head data available in training knowledge for either f...
Based on the provided market consensus, Demba Seck is a clear favorite with odds of 1.65. Without specific fighter data from live research,...
Demba Seck is the favorite in this matchup according to the bookmaker odds. While no specific fight data is available, the odds suggest Seck...
Demba Seck is the favorite with odds around 1.65, indicating implied probability near 60%. Training data suggests Seck has superior striking...
Bookmaker line: Demba Seck 64%
Method of victory
ConsensusDecision 4/6
Without fighter-specific striking accuracy, submission rate, or grappling proficiency data, I apply baseline MMA finish rates. Roughly 45–50...
Limited data on both fighters suggests low finishing rates. Training knowledge shows no standout power or submission threats for either. Con...
As I do not have specific fighter records or styles available from live research, this prediction relies on general MMA finish rate statisti...
Given the market favors Demba Seck, but neither fighter's specific finishing styles are known from the provided data, predicting a decision...
Both fighters have KO power, but Seck is known for striking finishes. Santos has been stopped in recent fights, increasing KO likelihood. Su...
Goes the distance
ConsensusNo 3/6
MMA bouts reach the distance (all rounds completed) in approximately 50–55% of cases across professional organizations. The over-1.5-rounds...
Totals market consensus around 1.5 rounds with slight lean to over implies competitive early action but potential for full fight. No known f...
Drawing from general MMA statistics in my training data through 2025-09, roughly 55% of fights typically end in a finish (KO/TKO or Submissi...
The odds for the fight to go the distance are competitive, with a slight lean towards 'Yes'. This suggests that while a finish is possible,...
Given both fighters' finishing tendencies and Seck's power, the fight is likely to end before the final bell. Santos has been finished early...
Round group
ConsensusRound 1 2/6
Round_group typically segments early (R1), mid (R2), late (R3+) finishes. Absent explicit odds for this market in the brief, I estimate base...
Standard non-title MMA bouts default to 3 rounds. Limited evidence either fighter forces early stoppage. Training data through 2023-09 shows...
Based on general MMA fight duration patterns from my training data through 2025-09, fights ending by decision are the most frequent single o...
Without information on fighter stamina or typical fight pacing, it's difficult to pinpoint a specific round for a finish. However, consideri...
Seck's explosive style often leads to early finishes. Santos is vulnerable early, making a first-round stoppage the most likely single round...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Demba Seck
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Demba Seck
DeepSeek V3
Demba Seck
Grok 4 Fast
Demba Seck
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jean Do Santos
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Demba Seck
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Bookmaker odds
2 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Jean Do Santos | Draw | Demba Seck |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fanduel | 2.50 | — | 1.49 |
| BetOnline | 2.55 | — | 1.56 |
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| BetOnline | 1.5 | 1.77 | 2.10 |
| Book | Jean Do Santos | Demba Seck |
|---|
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0264d4caf4646d7c…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jun 13 · 18:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Method of victory · Goes the distance · Round group
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | method_finish | goes_distance | round_group
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 3337,
"sport": "mma",
"venue": null,
"league": "MMA",
"starts_at": "2026-06-13T18:25:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 13 Jun 2026 18:25:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Demba Seck",
"home": "Jean Do Santos"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-12T19:07:44+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": {
"away": 1.65,
"home": 2.35
},
"note": "Bookmaker consensus odds at the moment of the call. Frozen here so settlement grades against the same line.",
"extra_markets": {
"h2h": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.63,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.63,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.63,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.63,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.61,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.35,
"outcome": "Jean Do Santos"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Demba Seck"
}
],
"totals": [
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.1,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.77,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.2,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.71,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.87,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 1.8,
"outcome": "Under"
},
{
"point": 1.5,
"price": 2.05,
"outcome": "Over"
}
]
}
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"method_finish",
"goes_distance",
"round_group"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.