Jannik SinnervsAlexander Zverev
AZAI predictions
2 markets · 16 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 3.5 3/32 models |
Jannik Sinner 16/16 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Over 3.5 |
68%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 3.5 Both players have strong grass-court serving games, and Sinner's recent form suggests competitive margins rather than dominant straight-sets...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Jannik Sinner Sinner has emerged as a dominant hard-court and grass-court player in 2025–2026, with improved serve velocity and first-strike aggression. Z... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
60%
Under 3.5 |
70%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 Given Sinner's recent tendency to close matches in straight sets (including a straight-sets semi) and his strong record versus Zverev, a str...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Jannik Sinner Jannik Sinner arrives as the defending Wimbledon champion with dominant grass form (improved All England Club record ~25-4) and he has a cle...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
|
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
under 3.5 |
75%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under 3.5 Given Sinner's recent form and head-to-head advantage, the match is likely to be decided in straight sets. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Jannik Sinner Jannik Sinner has a strong head-to-head record against Alexander Zverev, leading 7–4 in their career meetings, including a 6–2, 6–4 victory...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
over 3.5 |
72%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Best-of-five Wimbledon finals on grass frequently reach four or five sets when the second seed has elite serving. Sinner's consistency reduc...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Jannik Sinner Sinner holds a dominant head-to-head edge and superior grass-court movement entering 2026; training data through 2025 shows him winning four... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Over 3.5 Sets |
60%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Over 3.5 Sets Both Jannik Sinner and Alexander Zverev are top-tier players possessing powerful serves and groundstrokes, making it difficult for either to...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Jannik Sinner Jannik Sinner's recent ascendancy in men's tennis, particularly his improved grass-court game and enhanced best-of-5 stamina, positions him... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Over |
57%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over Given the expectation of a competitive match that could go to three sets, the total number of games is likely to exceed the benchmark. Both...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Jannik Sinner Jannik Sinner is favored due to his superior grass-court form and recent Grand Slam success. While Zverev is a capable player, Sinner's cons... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Under 4.5 |
65%
Jannik Sinner |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 4.5 Both players have strong serving games on grass, but Sinner's break point conversion and return skills are notably better. The match is like...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Jannik Sinner Sinner has been dominant on grass, winning Halle in 2025 and reaching Wimbledon semifinals in 2024. Zverev's game is less natural on grass,... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 3/32
Both players have strong grass-court serving games, and Sinner's recent form suggests competitive margins rather than dominant straight-sets...
Given Sinner's recent tendency to close matches in straight sets (including a straight-sets semi) and his strong record versus Zverev, a str...
Given Sinner's recent form and head-to-head advantage, the match is likely to be decided in straight sets. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/...
Best-of-five Wimbledon finals on grass frequently reach four or five sets when the second seed has elite serving. Sinner's consistency reduc...
Both Jannik Sinner and Alexander Zverev are top-tier players possessing powerful serves and groundstrokes, making it difficult for either to...
Given the expectation of a competitive match that could go to three sets, the total number of games is likely to exceed the benchmark. Both...
Both players have strong serving games on grass, but Sinner's break point conversion and return skills are notably better. The match is like...
Match winner
ConsensusJannik Sinner 16/16
Sinner has emerged as a dominant hard-court and grass-court player in 2025–2026, with improved serve velocity and first-strike aggression. Z...
Jannik Sinner arrives as the defending Wimbledon champion with dominant grass form (improved All England Club record ~25-4) and he has a cle...
Jannik Sinner has a strong head-to-head record against Alexander Zverev, leading 7–4 in their career meetings, including a 6–2, 6–4 victory...
Sinner holds a dominant head-to-head edge and superior grass-court movement entering 2026; training data through 2025 shows him winning four...
Jannik Sinner's recent ascendancy in men's tennis, particularly his improved grass-court game and enhanced best-of-5 stamina, positions him...
Jannik Sinner is favored due to his superior grass-court form and recent Grand Slam success. While Zverev is a capable player, Sinner's cons...
Sinner has been dominant on grass, winning Halle in 2025 and reaching Wimbledon semifinals in 2024. Zverev's game is less natural on grass,...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Opus 4.7
Jannik Sinner
Claude Opus 4.6
Jannik Sinner
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Jannik Sinner
Grok 4.3
Jannik Sinner
GPT-4o Mini
Jannik Sinner
Claude Opus 4.8
Jannik Sinner
Grok 4 Fast
Jannik Sinner
GPT-5 Mini
Jannik Sinner
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Jannik Sinner
GPT-5
Jannik Sinner
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jannik Sinner
o4-mini
Jannik Sinner
DeepSeek V3
Jannik Sinner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Jannik Sinner
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Jannik Sinner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jannik Sinner
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b196a7b16aab8641…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 12 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 12603,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": "London, Great Britain",
"league": "Wimbledon — Men's Singles",
"starts_at": "2026-07-12T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 12 Jul 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alexander Zverev",
"home": "Jannik Sinner"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
3 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
9 tool calls · 7 sources
7 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
15 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
12 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
21 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
24 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
3 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.