Janice TjenvsMirra Andreeva
MAAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Mirra Andreeva 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 sets 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Mirra Andreeva |
65%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Mirra Andreeva Mirra Andreeva is a rising junior star with superior hard-court credentials and has consistently outperformed older opponents at Grand Slams...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 While Andreeva is favored, Tjen is likely a competitive opponent at the US Open main draw stage, reducing the likelihood of a straight-sets... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Mirra Andreeva |
78%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Mirra Andreeva Training data through 2024 shows Mirra Andreeva as a top junior and early pro with elite hard-court results and break-point conversion. Jani...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
78%
under_2.5 Training data through 2024 indicates Andreeva routinely wins in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard. Limited data on Tjen s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
88%
Mirra Andreeva |
75%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Mirra Andreeva This prediction is based on training data up to my last update, as the match date is in the future (2026). Mirra Andreeva is a significantly...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 2.5 sets Given Mirra Andreeva's superior skill level, she is highly likely to win this match in straight sets against a less experienced opponent. Wh... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
95%
Mirra Andreeva |
75%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
95%
Mirra Andreeva Mirra Andreeva is a significantly higher-ranked player and has demonstrated strong performances on the WTA tour. Janice Tjen's ranking is co...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
2.0 Given the significant difference in ranking and expected performance, Mirra Andreeva is heavily favored to win this match in straight sets....
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
Mirra Andreeva |
75%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Mirra Andreeva Based on training data through 2025-09, Mirra Andreeva is a top-10 player with significant Grand Slam experience, while Janice Tjen is a qua...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 2.5 sets The vast ranking and experience gap between Andreeva and Tjen points to a straight-sets victory. Andreeva's consistent serve and aggressive... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMirra Andreeva 5/5
Mirra Andreeva is a rising junior star with superior hard-court credentials and has consistently outperformed older opponents at Grand Slams...
Training data through 2024 shows Mirra Andreeva as a top junior and early pro with elite hard-court results and break-point conversion. Jani...
This prediction is based on training data up to my last update, as the match date is in the future (2026). Mirra Andreeva is a significantly...
Mirra Andreeva is a significantly higher-ranked player and has demonstrated strong performances on the WTA tour. Janice Tjen's ranking is co...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Mirra Andreeva is a top-10 player with significant Grand Slam experience, while Janice Tjen is a qua...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 sets 2/10
While Andreeva is favored, Tjen is likely a competitive opponent at the US Open main draw stage, reducing the likelihood of a straight-sets...
Training data through 2024 indicates Andreeva routinely wins in straight sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard. Limited data on Tjen s...
Given Mirra Andreeva's superior skill level, she is highly likely to win this match in straight sets against a less experienced opponent. Wh...
Given the significant difference in ranking and expected performance, Mirra Andreeva is heavily favored to win this match in straight sets....
The vast ranking and experience gap between Andreeva and Tjen points to a straight-sets victory. Andreeva's consistent serve and aggressive...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Mirra Andreeva
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mirra Andreeva
DeepSeek V3
Mirra Andreeva
Grok 4 Fast
Mirra Andreeva
Claude Haiku 4.5
Mirra Andreeva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9a4bdcd76ca88b46…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 1 · 19:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31789,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Mirra Andreeva",
"home": "Janice Tjen"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.