Janice TjenvsDarja Vidmanova
DVYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Janice Tjen 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Janice Tjen |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Janice Tjen Both players operate at a lower tier of professional tennis with limited recent ATP/WTA ranking visibility in my training data (through 2025...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Given neither player has dominant hard-court credentials or overwhelming serve-and-volley patterns evident in training knowledge, a competit... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Janice Tjen |
62%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Janice Tjen Both players are relatively low-profile on the WTA tour with limited public head-to-head data entering 2026. Home player Janice Tjen receive...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over 2.5 Early-round WTA 500 matches on hard courts frequently extend to three sets when both players lack dominant serve data. Limited ranking separ... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Janice Tjen |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Janice Tjen Based on my training data through 2025-09, both players are primarily active in collegiate and lower-tier ITF circuits. Without current form...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Matches between similarly skilled players, often seen in the early stages of tournaments or when players are developing, frequently extend t... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Janice Tjen |
60%
Darja Vidmanova |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Janice Tjen Based on training data, Janice Tjen has demonstrated a stronger performance profile on hard courts and generally higher consistency in recen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Darja Vidmanova Given the slight edge for Janice Tjen and the typical nature of matches between players of this caliber on hard courts, it's likely that the... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Janice Tjen |
65%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Janice Tjen Both players are lower-tier ITF/WTA-125 level competitors with minimal tour-level hard-court data, so this is close to a coin flip. Tjen, co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Given the near-even matchup and limited separation between these ITF-level players, a three-setter is the most probable outcome. Neither has... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJanice Tjen 5/5
Both players operate at a lower tier of professional tennis with limited recent ATP/WTA ranking visibility in my training data (through 2025...
Both players are relatively low-profile on the WTA tour with limited public head-to-head data entering 2026. Home player Janice Tjen receive...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, both players are primarily active in collegiate and lower-tier ITF circuits. Without current form...
Based on training data, Janice Tjen has demonstrated a stronger performance profile on hard courts and generally higher consistency in recen...
Both players are lower-tier ITF/WTA-125 level competitors with minimal tour-level hard-court data, so this is close to a coin flip. Tjen, co...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
Given neither player has dominant hard-court credentials or overwhelming serve-and-volley patterns evident in training knowledge, a competit...
Early-round WTA 500 matches on hard courts frequently extend to three sets when both players lack dominant serve data. Limited ranking separ...
Matches between similarly skilled players, often seen in the early stages of tournaments or when players are developing, frequently extend t...
Given the slight edge for Janice Tjen and the typical nature of matches between players of this caliber on hard courts, it's likely that the...
Given the near-even matchup and limited separation between these ITF-level players, a three-setter is the most probable outcome. Neither has...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Janice Tjen
Claude Haiku 4.5
Janice Tjen
Grok 4 Fast
Janice Tjen
DeepSeek V3
Janice Tjen
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Janice Tjen
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1d455d8159e8e711…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 13 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 42051,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Guadalajara Open presentado por Santander",
"starts_at": "2026-09-13T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 13 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Darja Vidmanova",
"home": "Janice Tjen"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.