Jan-Lennard StruffvsCamilo Ugo Carabelli
CUAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Jan-Lennard Struff 5/5 models |
under_3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Jan-Lennard Struff |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Jan-Lennard Struff Struff is a seasoned German hard-court player with a strong serve and proven US Open pedigree, while Carabelli is an emerging Argentine tale...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 In best-of-5 Grand Slam tennis, matches between a seeded or experienced player (Struff) and a rising challenger (Carabelli) often go the dis... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Jan-Lennard Struff |
61%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Jan-Lennard Struff Struff holds a clear ranking and serve advantage on hard courts over Carabelli whose game is built for clay. Historical form shows Struff wi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_3.5 Struff's serve typically limits sets against lower-tier opponents leading to quick finishes in best-of-five. Carabelli lacks the firepower t... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Jan-Lennard Struff |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Jan-Lennard Struff Jan-Lennard Struff is a powerful player whose game is well-suited for hard courts, including the US Open. Camilo Ugo Carabelli, in contrast,...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets While Struff is heavily favored on hard courts, the best-of-five format in a Grand Slam can often lead to extended matches. Carabelli's tena...
1 source cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Jan-Lennard Struff |
65%
Camilo Ugo Carabelli |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Jan-Lennard Struff Struff is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger track record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Carabelli has shown...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Camilo Ugo Carabelli While Struff is favored, Carabelli is capable of taking a set, especially if Struff has an off day or Carabelli finds a strong rhythm on ser...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Jan-Lennard Struff |
55%
under_4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Jan-Lennard Struff Based on training data through 2025, Struff has a superior hard-court resume with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game, which are k...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_4.5 Struff's serving strength and ability to dominate on hard courts should allow him to win in four sets or fewer, as he is not known for long... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJan-Lennard Struff 5/5
Struff is a seasoned German hard-court player with a strong serve and proven US Open pedigree, while Carabelli is an emerging Argentine tale...
Struff holds a clear ranking and serve advantage on hard courts over Carabelli whose game is built for clay. Historical form shows Struff wi...
Jan-Lennard Struff is a powerful player whose game is well-suited for hard courts, including the US Open. Camilo Ugo Carabelli, in contrast,...
Struff is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger track record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Carabelli has shown...
Based on training data through 2025, Struff has a superior hard-court resume with a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game, which are k...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_3.5 1/10
In best-of-5 Grand Slam tennis, matches between a seeded or experienced player (Struff) and a rising challenger (Carabelli) often go the dis...
Struff's serve typically limits sets against lower-tier opponents leading to quick finishes in best-of-five. Carabelli lacks the firepower t...
While Struff is heavily favored on hard courts, the best-of-five format in a Grand Slam can often lead to extended matches. Carabelli's tena...
While Struff is favored, Carabelli is capable of taking a set, especially if Struff has an off day or Carabelli finds a strong rhythm on ser...
Struff's serving strength and ability to dominate on hard courts should allow him to win in four sets or fewer, as he is not known for long...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Jan-Lennard Struff
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Jan-Lennard Struff
Grok 4 Fast
Jan-Lennard Struff
DeepSeek V3
Jan-Lennard Struff
Claude Haiku 4.5
Jan-Lennard Struff
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b8e26c28c111f302…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 1 · 19:40 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31734,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Camilo Ugo Carabelli",
"home": "Jan-Lennard Struff"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.