James DuckworthvsMatteo Arnaldi
MAAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Matteo Arnaldi 3/5 models |
under 4/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
James Duckworth |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
James Duckworth Duckworth is the more experienced hard-court competitor with a deeper record on fast surfaces, and his serve-and-volley tendencies suit the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Best-of-5 Grand Slam matches between players of middling seeding tend to extend to at least 3 sets, particularly on hard court where serve-h... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Matteo Arnaldi |
58%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Matteo Arnaldi Arnaldi holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from 2024-2025; Duckworth is a veteran qualifier with limited recent success...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Best-of-five format favors the higher-ranked player closing in straight or four sets on hard courts. Duckworth lacks the firepower to push e... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Matteo Arnaldi |
70%
Over 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Matteo Arnaldi Matteo Arnaldi, expected to be in his prime by 2026 based on his career trajectory, possesses the athleticism and aggressive game style well...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 sets Despite Arnaldi being favored, James Duckworth's experience and hard-court proficiency suggest he will put up a strong fight, likely winning... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Matteo Arnaldi |
60%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Matteo Arnaldi Matteo Arnaldi is ranked significantly higher than James Duckworth and has shown better recent form on hard courts. Arnaldi's aggressive bas...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under Given Arnaldi's strong form and higher ranking, he is expected to win this match efficiently. While Duckworth can be a competitive opponent,...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
James Duckworth |
60%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
James Duckworth Training data through 2025-09. Duckworth has solid hard-court results and a reliable serve, while Arnaldi is more inconsistent on this surfa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_3.5 Both players are competitive in best-of-five matches, and their hard-court styles lead to closely contested sets. With each player holding s... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMatteo Arnaldi 3/5
Duckworth is the more experienced hard-court competitor with a deeper record on fast surfaces, and his serve-and-volley tendencies suit the...
Arnaldi holds the higher ranking and better hard-court results from 2024-2025; Duckworth is a veteran qualifier with limited recent success...
Matteo Arnaldi, expected to be in his prime by 2026 based on his career trajectory, possesses the athleticism and aggressive game style well...
Matteo Arnaldi is ranked significantly higher than James Duckworth and has shown better recent form on hard courts. Arnaldi's aggressive bas...
Training data through 2025-09. Duckworth has solid hard-court results and a reliable serve, while Arnaldi is more inconsistent on this surfa...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 4/10
Best-of-5 Grand Slam matches between players of middling seeding tend to extend to at least 3 sets, particularly on hard court where serve-h...
Best-of-five format favors the higher-ranked player closing in straight or four sets on hard courts. Duckworth lacks the firepower to push e...
Despite Arnaldi being favored, James Duckworth's experience and hard-court proficiency suggest he will put up a strong fight, likely winning...
Given Arnaldi's strong form and higher ranking, he is expected to win this match efficiently. While Duckworth can be a competitive opponent,...
Both players are competitive in best-of-five matches, and their hard-court styles lead to closely contested sets. With each player holding s...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Matteo Arnaldi
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Matteo Arnaldi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Matteo Arnaldi
Claude Haiku 4.5
James Duckworth
DeepSeek V3
James Duckworth
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3efc00a26e0f7fcf…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 17:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31723,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Matteo Arnaldi",
"home": "James Duckworth"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.