James DuckworthvsFabian Marozsan
FMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
James Duckworth 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
James Duckworth |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
James Duckworth Duckworth is an experienced hard-court player with a solid ATP record, particularly on North American hard courts where Winston-Salem is pla...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Winston-Salem is a hard-court ATP 250 event typically attracting competitive mid-tier matchups. Best-of-three format favors close contests,... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
James Duckworth |
62%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
James Duckworth Duckworth holds a slight edge on hard courts based on career patterns through 2025. Marozsan has shown inconsistency away from clay. Limited...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 2.5 Both players prefer quicker points on hard. Duckworth's serve should limit extended rallies and sets. Expect a straight-sets outcome given s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Fabian Marozsan |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Fabian Marozsan Based on my training data up to my last knowledge update, Fabian Marozsan demonstrated a higher upward trajectory and more impactful perform...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Given the lack of a significant disparity in skill between these two hard-court specialists, and the potential for a tight match, it's reaso... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Fabian Marozsan |
60%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Fabian Marozsan Fabian Marozsan is a higher-ranked player with stronger recent form, particularly on hard courts. James Duckworth, while experienced, has sh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.0 Given Marozsan's expected dominance and Duckworth's potential to win a set, a two-set match is the most probable outcome. Duckworth's serve... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
James Duckworth |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
James Duckworth Based on my training data (through early 2025), Duckworth is a seasoned hard-court competitor with a solid serve and consistent baseline gam...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Matchups between a consistent hard-court grinder and a clay-court specialist often extend to three sets, especially when the underdog can ke... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusJames Duckworth 3/5
Duckworth is an experienced hard-court player with a solid ATP record, particularly on North American hard courts where Winston-Salem is pla...
Duckworth holds a slight edge on hard courts based on career patterns through 2025. Marozsan has shown inconsistency away from clay. Limited...
Based on my training data up to my last knowledge update, Fabian Marozsan demonstrated a higher upward trajectory and more impactful perform...
Fabian Marozsan is a higher-ranked player with stronger recent form, particularly on hard courts. James Duckworth, while experienced, has sh...
Based on my training data (through early 2025), Duckworth is a seasoned hard-court competitor with a solid serve and consistent baseline gam...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 3/10
Winston-Salem is a hard-court ATP 250 event typically attracting competitive mid-tier matchups. Best-of-three format favors close contests,...
Both players prefer quicker points on hard. Duckworth's serve should limit extended rallies and sets. Expect a straight-sets outcome given s...
Given the lack of a significant disparity in skill between these two hard-court specialists, and the potential for a tight match, it's reaso...
Given Marozsan's expected dominance and Duckworth's potential to win a set, a two-set match is the most probable outcome. Duckworth's serve...
Matchups between a consistent hard-court grinder and a clay-court specialist often extend to three sets, especially when the underdog can ke...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Fabian Marozsan
Claude Haiku 4.5
James Duckworth
DeepSeek V3
James Duckworth
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Fabian Marozsan
Grok 4 Fast
James Duckworth
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f9d6601cf073db26…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 02:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31710,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Winston-Salem Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-28T00:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Fabian Marozsan",
"home": "James Duckworth"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.