Irene BurillovsLucia Bronzetti
LBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Lucia Bronzetti 5/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Lucia Bronzetti |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Lucia Bronzetti Lucia Bronzetti is the higher-ranked player (ITF/WTA ranking advantage) and has historically performed better on hard courts, which is the l...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Bronzetti's baseline depth and Burillo's defensive style suggest a match that will go beyond two straight sets. Bronzetti is not a dominant... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Lucia Bronzetti |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Lucia Bronzetti Lucia Bronzetti holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on clay than Irene Burillo based on pre-2025 data. Head-to-head and surfa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Best-of-three format on clay typically ends in straight sets when one player holds a clear ranking edge. Burillo lacks the firepower to forc... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
78%
Lucia Bronzetti |
68%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Lucia Bronzetti Lucia Bronzetti is generally a higher-ranked player with more experience on the WTA tour and typically performs well on hard courts. Irene B...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Under 2.5 sets Given Bronzetti's clear advantage in skill and surface preference, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome for this match. Buri... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Lucia Bronzetti |
60%
Lucia Bronzetti |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Lucia Bronzetti Based on general training data, Lucia Bronzetti is typically ranked higher and has a more established presence on the WTA tour than Irene Bu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Lucia Bronzetti Given Bronzetti's likely advantage, she is expected to win in straight sets. While Burillo may win a set, Bronzetti's consistency and higher... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Lucia Bronzetti |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Lucia Bronzetti Training knowledge through 2025-09 indicates Bronzetti is a more experienced tour-level player, typically ranked higher and comfortable on h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Although Bronzetti is favored, Burillo has shown competitiveness in ITF finals and could push a set, especially if she serves well. Such mat... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLucia Bronzetti 5/5
Lucia Bronzetti is the higher-ranked player (ITF/WTA ranking advantage) and has historically performed better on hard courts, which is the l...
Lucia Bronzetti holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on clay than Irene Burillo based on pre-2025 data. Head-to-head and surfa...
Lucia Bronzetti is generally a higher-ranked player with more experience on the WTA tour and typically performs well on hard courts. Irene B...
Based on general training data, Lucia Bronzetti is typically ranked higher and has a more established presence on the WTA tour than Irene Bu...
Training knowledge through 2025-09 indicates Bronzetti is a more experienced tour-level player, typically ranked higher and comfortable on h...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Bronzetti's baseline depth and Burillo's defensive style suggest a match that will go beyond two straight sets. Bronzetti is not a dominant...
Best-of-three format on clay typically ends in straight sets when one player holds a clear ranking edge. Burillo lacks the firepower to forc...
Given Bronzetti's clear advantage in skill and surface preference, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outcome for this match. Buri...
Given Bronzetti's likely advantage, she is expected to win in straight sets. While Burillo may win a set, Bronzetti's consistency and higher...
Although Bronzetti is favored, Burillo has shown competitiveness in ITF finals and could push a set, especially if she serves well. Such mat...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Lucia Bronzetti
Grok 4 Fast
Lucia Bronzetti
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lucia Bronzetti
Claude Haiku 4.5
Lucia Bronzetti
DeepSeek V3
Lucia Bronzetti
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
806fd8c83bd5cda1…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 11:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38966,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lucia Bronzetti",
"home": "Irene Burillo"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.