Iga SwiatekvsJessica Pegula
JPYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
Iga Swiatek 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Over 2.5 |
68%
Iga Swiatek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both players are baseline grinders capable of extended rallies and break-point battles on hard courts. Pegula's aggressive game and strong r...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Iga Swiatek Swiatek holds a significant head-to-head advantage over Pegula (multiple wins in recent years) and is the superior hard-court player with st... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
under 22.5 |
72%
Iga Swiatek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under 22.5 Efficient serving and limited breaks are expected on outdoor hard courts in Cincinnati. Swiatek's recent matches against top competition hav...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Iga Swiatek Swiatek holds superior overall form and head-to-head edge against Pegula on hard courts through 2025. Pegula's strong baseline game is neutr... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Over 2.5 Sets |
62%
Iga Swiatek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Sets Matches between Swiatek and Pegula, particularly on hard courts, are typically highly competitive and often go the distance. Both players po...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Iga Swiatek As this match is scheduled for 2026, real-time data is unavailable; this prediction relies solely on my training data. Swiatek, a multi-Gran... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
2.5 |
65%
Iga Swiatek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
2.5 Given their closely contested matches and Pegula's ability to push Swiatek, it's likely this match will go to three sets. While Swiatek is t...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Iga Swiatek Iga Swiatek holds a 5-3 head-to-head advantage over Jessica Pegula, including recent wins on hard courts. While Pegula is a strong hard cour...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Over 2.5 |
74%
Iga Swiatek |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Given Swiatek's dominance, she is likely to win in straight sets, but Pegula's consistency and ability to push top players could force a thi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
74%
Iga Swiatek Training data through 2025-09: Swiatek holds a strong head-to-head edge over Pegula, particularly on hard courts where her aggressive baseli... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Both players are baseline grinders capable of extended rallies and break-point battles on hard courts. Pegula's aggressive game and strong r...
Efficient serving and limited breaks are expected on outdoor hard courts in Cincinnati. Swiatek's recent matches against top competition hav...
Matches between Swiatek and Pegula, particularly on hard courts, are typically highly competitive and often go the distance. Both players po...
Given their closely contested matches and Pegula's ability to push Swiatek, it's likely this match will go to three sets. While Swiatek is t...
Given Swiatek's dominance, she is likely to win in straight sets, but Pegula's consistency and ability to push top players could force a thi...
Match winner
ConsensusIga Swiatek 5/5
Swiatek holds a significant head-to-head advantage over Pegula (multiple wins in recent years) and is the superior hard-court player with st...
Swiatek holds superior overall form and head-to-head edge against Pegula on hard courts through 2025. Pegula's strong baseline game is neutr...
As this match is scheduled for 2026, real-time data is unavailable; this prediction relies solely on my training data. Swiatek, a multi-Gran...
Iga Swiatek holds a 5-3 head-to-head advantage over Jessica Pegula, including recent wins on hard courts. While Pegula is a strong hard cour...
Training data through 2025-09: Swiatek holds a strong head-to-head edge over Pegula, particularly on hard courts where her aggressive baseli...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Iga Swiatek
Grok 4 Fast
Iga Swiatek
Claude Haiku 4.5
Iga Swiatek
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Iga Swiatek
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Iga Swiatek
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3dc861eb0d523de4…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29748,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Cincinnati Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jessica Pegula",
"home": "Iga Swiatek"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.