Hugo GastonvsDaniil Medvedev
DMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Daniil Medvedev 5/5 models |
Under 3.5 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Daniil Medvedev |
68%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev is a top-10 consistent performer with a strong hard-court game, particularly at the US Open where he reached the final in 2021 and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Under 3.5 Medvedev's dominant serve and hard-court movement should allow him to control the match rhythm and finish in straight or four sets. Gaston c... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
88%
Daniil Medvedev |
72%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev is a multiple Grand Slam finalist with far superior hard-court pedigree and serve metrics compared to Gaston. Gaston has shown limi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
under 3.5 Medvedev's serve and return consistency typically close out lower-ranked opponents in straight sets on hard courts. Gaston lacks the firepow... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
85%
Daniil Medvedev |
60%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Daniil Medvedev This prediction is based on general player profiles and historical performance up to my last training data cut-off, as the event is schedule...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 Given Medvedev's significant advantage on hard courts and Gaston's less potent hard-court game, a straight-sets victory for Medvedev is the... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
90%
Daniil Medvedev |
75%
Under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
90%
Daniil Medvedev Daniil Medvedev is a far superior player, especially on hard courts like those used at the US Open. His ATP ranking and recent performance h...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under Medvedev's dominance on hard courts suggests he will likely close out this match efficiently. While Gaston can be tricky, Medvedev's superio...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
Daniil Medvedev |
75%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Daniil Medvedev Based on training data through early 2025, Medvedev is a former US Open champion and top-5 player, while Gaston is ranked outside the top 50...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 3.5 Given the class disparity, Medvedev is expected to dominate in straight sets, as he typically does against lower-ranked opponents in early r... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDaniil Medvedev 5/5
Medvedev is a top-10 consistent performer with a strong hard-court game, particularly at the US Open where he reached the final in 2021 and...
Medvedev is a multiple Grand Slam finalist with far superior hard-court pedigree and serve metrics compared to Gaston. Gaston has shown limi...
This prediction is based on general player profiles and historical performance up to my last training data cut-off, as the event is schedule...
Daniil Medvedev is a far superior player, especially on hard courts like those used at the US Open. His ATP ranking and recent performance h...
Based on training data through early 2025, Medvedev is a former US Open champion and top-5 player, while Gaston is ranked outside the top 50...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 3.5 3/10
Medvedev's dominant serve and hard-court movement should allow him to control the match rhythm and finish in straight or four sets. Gaston c...
Medvedev's serve and return consistency typically close out lower-ranked opponents in straight sets on hard courts. Gaston lacks the firepow...
Given Medvedev's significant advantage on hard courts and Gaston's less potent hard-court game, a straight-sets victory for Medvedev is the...
Medvedev's dominance on hard courts suggests he will likely close out this match efficiently. While Gaston can be tricky, Medvedev's superio...
Given the class disparity, Medvedev is expected to dominate in straight sets, as he typically does against lower-ranked opponents in early r...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Daniil Medvedev
Grok 4 Fast
Daniil Medvedev
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Daniil Medvedev
DeepSeek V3
Daniil Medvedev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniil Medvedev
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a398cc5c10c621ed…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33684,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T17:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniil Medvedev",
"home": "Hugo Gaston"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.