Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
MLB
Final 9–3
Houston Astros logo

Houston AstrosvsCleveland Guardians

Cleveland Guardians logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final9–3 Locked 30picks · 17 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Houston Astros 9–3 Cleveland Guardians

All 6 AIs backed Houston Astros — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Houston Astros 6/6
Correct calls
6/6
Final
9–3

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/9
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over 8.5

Both Houston and Cleveland field competitive offenses capable of generating consistent run production. Late June scheduling typically featur...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% under L

Both teams have shown inconsistent offensive performances recently, suggesting a lower-scoring game. The weather forecast indicates clear sk...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams feature lineups capable of moderate scoring output in typical conditions. Pitching matchups often allow runs through 2025 data. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Over 8.5 W

The Houston Astros offense, as per general knowledge from my training data, is capable of producing significant runs. While the Cleveland Gu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Without specific starting pitcher information or recent game logs, predicting totals is challenging. However, MLB games on average tend to s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over 8.5

Both offenses capable of scoring, and bullpens have been inconsistent. Astros' ballpark slightly favors hitting. Historical average between...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Houston Astros 3/9
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Houston -1.5

The Astros' home-field advantage and historical roster competitiveness support a small run-line lean. A 1.5-run margin is modest enough to r...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Houston Astros W

The Astros' superior recent form and home advantage make them likely to win by at least two runs against the Guardians, who have been strugg...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Houston Astros

Astros typically cover modest spreads at home given their offensive edge. Guardians struggle to win by multiple runs away. Training data thr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Cleveland Guardians +1.5 L

While the Astros are favored to win, covering a -1.5 run line in MLB is notoriously difficult, as many games are decided by one run. The Gua...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Cleveland Guardians L

While the Astros are favored slightly to win outright, the Guardians have a knack for keeping games close, especially when facing strong opp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 48% Houston Astros -1.5 W

Astros are strong at home but not dominant enough to cover -1.5 consistently. Guardians can keep games close with solid defense and timely h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First 5 innings

Consensus
Houston Astros 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 53% Over 4.5

Early-inning MLB scoring in June tends toward moderate pace as batters work counts and pitchers establish command. Houston and Cleveland bot...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Houston Astros

The Astros' strong starting pitchers and home field advantage suggest they will lead after the first five innings, despite both teams' recen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Houston Astros

Early game edge leans slightly to Houston starters and lineup depth. Guardians have been slower starters on road historically. Training data...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 45% Houston Astros F5

The Astros traditionally feature strong starting pitching and an offense that tends to start hot, especially in home games. This combination...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Houston Astros

Houston's historical strength suggests they often start games strong. Without live data on starting pitchers, this prediction leans on the A...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Houston Astros

Astros' starting rotation has been effective early, while Guardians often rely on bullpen later. Home field advantage gives Astros edge in f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Houston Astros 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Houston Astros W

Houston has been a consistently strong franchise with a competitive roster and home-field advantage on 20 June 2026. Cleveland has shown com...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Houston Astros W

The Houston Astros have a strong home record and have been in better recent form compared to the Cleveland Guardians, who have struggled in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 7 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 56% Houston Astros W

Houston Astros hold a stronger overall roster and home advantage based on historical performance patterns through 2025. Cleveland Guardians...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Houston Astros W

Based on training data through mid-2024, the Houston Astros have consistently been a top-tier team in MLB, particularly strong at home. Thei...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Houston Astros W

Based on training data, the Houston Astros generally hold a historical advantage over the Cleveland Guardians. While specific recent form is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Houston Astros W

Astros have strong home record and superior lineup depth even without key injuries. Guardians struggle on the road against quality pitching....

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Houston Astros

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Houston Astros

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Houston Astros

58
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Houston Astros

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Houston Astros

56
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Houston Astros

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 3d6b6de16598aa5d…
Kickoff
Sat, Jun 20 · 00:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 4346,
        "sport": "baseball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "MLB",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-20T00:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Cleveland Guardians",
        "home": "Houston Astros"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T06:13:00+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_five_innings"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →