Himeno SakatsumevsCristina Bucsa
CBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Cristina Bucsa 4/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Cristina Bucsa |
65%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa is the higher-ranked player (typically WTA top 100) with more consistent hard-court results and experience at Grand Slams. Hi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 1.5 In best-of-three women's singles, a 2–0 sweep is less common than a competitive match. Both players have shown resilience and competitive dr... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Cristina Bucsa |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa holds a slight edge in experience on hard courts from prior seasons and typically converts break points more efficiently than...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players exhibit strong first-serve percentages on hard courts in historical matches, often closing sets quickly. Sakatsume's recent pat... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Cristina Bucsa |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Cristina Bucsa Based on general career performance and ranking trajectory from my training data (up to early 2024), Cristina Bucsa is a more established pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 While Cristina Bucsa is the favorite based on overall career strength, Himeno Sakatsume's presence in the US Open main draw suggests she is... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Cristina Bucsa |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Cristina Bucsa Cristina Bucsa is a more established player with a higher ranking and more experience on the WTA tour. Based on general tennis knowledge, sh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given that Bucsa is the favorite, a three-set match is plausible if Sakatsume can win a set. However, Bucsa is also capable of a straight-se... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Himeno Sakatsume |
55%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Himeno Sakatsume Based on training data through 2025-09, Sakatsume has shown stronger hard-court form and a more consistent serve, while Bucsa has been strug...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_2.5 Given the competitive nature of these two players and their similar levels, a three-set match is likely. Both have been involved in close ma... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusCristina Bucsa 4/5
Cristina Bucsa is the higher-ranked player (typically WTA top 100) with more consistent hard-court results and experience at Grand Slams. Hi...
Cristina Bucsa holds a slight edge in experience on hard courts from prior seasons and typically converts break points more efficiently than...
Based on general career performance and ranking trajectory from my training data (up to early 2024), Cristina Bucsa is a more established pl...
Cristina Bucsa is a more established player with a higher ranking and more experience on the WTA tour. Based on general tennis knowledge, sh...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Sakatsume has shown stronger hard-court form and a more consistent serve, while Bucsa has been strug...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
In best-of-three women's singles, a 2–0 sweep is less common than a competitive match. Both players have shown resilience and competitive dr...
Both players exhibit strong first-serve percentages on hard courts in historical matches, often closing sets quickly. Sakatsume's recent pat...
While Cristina Bucsa is the favorite based on overall career strength, Himeno Sakatsume's presence in the US Open main draw suggests she is...
Given that Bucsa is the favorite, a three-set match is plausible if Sakatsume can win a set. However, Bucsa is also capable of a straight-se...
Given the competitive nature of these two players and their similar levels, a three-set match is likely. Both have been involved in close ma...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Cristina Bucsa
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Cristina Bucsa
DeepSeek V3
Himeno Sakatsume
Claude Haiku 4.5
Cristina Bucsa
Grok 4 Fast
Cristina Bucsa
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f2e87e8f36c39d87…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 3 · 19:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35129,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cristina Bucsa",
"home": "Himeno Sakatsume"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.