Harry WendelkenvsVilius Gaubas
VGAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Harry Wendelken 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Harry Wendelken |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Harry Wendelken Both players are relatively modest-ranked professionals competing in the US Open main draw. Wendelken, a German player, has shown better con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At this level of men's tennis (Challenger-ranked players), matches tend to be competitive and rarely one-sided. Even with a skill gap favori... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Vilius Gaubas |
62%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Vilius Gaubas Both players are low-ranked journeymen with limited main-draw experience at Grand Slams. Training data through 2025-09 shows Gaubas with a s...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_3.5 US Open matches for players of this level frequently go the distance on hard courts. Training data through 2025-09 indicates both have endur... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Vilius Gaubas |
65%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Vilius Gaubas Based on available training data up to my last update, Vilius Gaubas generally displayed a slightly more consistent performance profile on h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 Sets Given the projected evenness of the match between these two players, who lack significant distinguishing factors based on historical data fr... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Harry Wendelken |
55%
Vilius Gaubas |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Harry Wendelken Based on training data, Harry Wendelken is a more established player on the ATP tour with a better overall record and more experience on har...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Vilius Gaubas While Wendelken is favored, Gaubas has shown an ability to win sets, especially if he can find his rhythm on serve. A two-set victory for We... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Harry Wendelken |
55%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Harry Wendelken Training data through 2025-09: Wendelken has better results on hard courts, with a higher serve hold percentage and more aggressive baseline...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 With both players being relatively evenly matched at this level, matches often extend to four or five sets. Wendelken's ability to win tight... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusHarry Wendelken 3/5
Both players are relatively modest-ranked professionals competing in the US Open main draw. Wendelken, a German player, has shown better con...
Both players are low-ranked journeymen with limited main-draw experience at Grand Slams. Training data through 2025-09 shows Gaubas with a s...
Based on available training data up to my last update, Vilius Gaubas generally displayed a slightly more consistent performance profile on h...
Based on training data, Harry Wendelken is a more established player on the ATP tour with a better overall record and more experience on har...
Training data through 2025-09: Wendelken has better results on hard courts, with a higher serve hold percentage and more aggressive baseline...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
At this level of men's tennis (Challenger-ranked players), matches tend to be competitive and rarely one-sided. Even with a skill gap favori...
US Open matches for players of this level frequently go the distance on hard courts. Training data through 2025-09 indicates both have endur...
Given the projected evenness of the match between these two players, who lack significant distinguishing factors based on historical data fr...
While Wendelken is favored, Gaubas has shown an ability to win sets, especially if he can find his rhythm on serve. A two-set victory for We...
With both players being relatively evenly matched at this level, matches often extend to four or five sets. Wendelken's ability to win tight...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Harry Wendelken
Claude Haiku 4.5
Harry Wendelken
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Harry Wendelken
Grok 4 Fast
Vilius Gaubas
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Vilius Gaubas
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
274673f6d3e64ded…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 28 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31685,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Vilius Gaubas",
"home": "Harry Wendelken"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.