Harry WendelkenvsLuciano Darderi
LDAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Luciano Darderi 4/5 models |
4 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Luciano Darderi |
62%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Luciano Darderi Both players are lower-ranked professionals competing at the US Open (hard court), where Darderi has shown more consistent ATP-level results...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 2.5 Both Wendelken and Darderi are mid-tier professionals capable of winning sets but unlikely to blow each other out decisively. On hard court,... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Luciano Darderi |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Luciano Darderi Luciano Darderi holds a significantly higher ranking and better hard-court results than Harry Wendelken based on training data through 2025-...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Darderi is expected to dominate and close the match in straight sets given the large gap in class. Best-of-3 format on hard favors the highe... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Luciano Darderi |
45%
4 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Luciano Darderi This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data, as the match date is in the distant future. Luciano Darderi, thou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
45%
4 Sets While Darderi is favored, Wendelken's familiarity with hard courts and determination could allow him to snatch a set, preventing a straight-... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Harry Wendelken |
65%
Luciano Darderi |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Harry Wendelken Based on my training data, Harry Wendelken is generally favored in this matchup. While Luciano Darderi has shown some potential, Wendelken's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Luciano Darderi Given the slight edge to Harry Wendelken, a 2-set victory is the most probable outcome. This accounts for the possibility of a quick match w... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Luciano Darderi |
60%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Luciano Darderi Based on training data through early 2025, Darderi is a more established ATP player with a higher ranking and better results on hard courts,...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 Given Darderi's higher level, he is likely to win in straight sets or in four sets, making under 3.5 sets a reasonable bet. Wendelken, as a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLuciano Darderi 4/5
Both players are lower-ranked professionals competing at the US Open (hard court), where Darderi has shown more consistent ATP-level results...
Luciano Darderi holds a significantly higher ranking and better hard-court results than Harry Wendelken based on training data through 2025-...
This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data, as the match date is in the distant future. Luciano Darderi, thou...
Based on my training data, Harry Wendelken is generally favored in this matchup. While Luciano Darderi has shown some potential, Wendelken's...
Based on training data through early 2025, Darderi is a more established ATP player with a higher ranking and better results on hard courts,...
Over / Under
Consensus4 Sets 1/10
Both Wendelken and Darderi are mid-tier professionals capable of winning sets but unlikely to blow each other out decisively. On hard court,...
Darderi is expected to dominate and close the match in straight sets given the large gap in class. Best-of-3 format on hard favors the highe...
While Darderi is favored, Wendelken's familiarity with hard courts and determination could allow him to snatch a set, preventing a straight-...
Given the slight edge to Harry Wendelken, a 2-set victory is the most probable outcome. This accounts for the possibility of a quick match w...
Given Darderi's higher level, he is likely to win in straight sets or in four sets, making under 3.5 sets a reasonable bet. Wendelken, as a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Luciano Darderi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Luciano Darderi
DeepSeek V3
Luciano Darderi
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Harry Wendelken
Claude Haiku 4.5
Luciano Darderi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
af0789e720a5e6b0…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 19:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33687,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Luciano Darderi",
"home": "Harry Wendelken"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.