Hamad MedjedovicvsKamil Majchrzak
KMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Hamad Medjedovic 5/5 models |
under_3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Hamad Medjedovic |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Hamad Medjedovic Medjedovic has shown stronger hard-court form and consistency in recent seasons on the ATP circuit, with a more reliable serve that should t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Both players are mid-tier ATP competitors with serviceable but not dominant games, suggesting tight sets rather than one-sided dismissals. H... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Hamad Medjedovic |
62%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Hamad Medjedovic Medjedovic is the younger player with higher upside on hard courts based on pre-2024 results. Majchrzak has shown inconsistency in best-of-5...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_3.5 Both players lack sustained top-level experience at slams, favoring a quicker resolution. Hard-court conditions at the US Open typically rew... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Hamad Medjedovic |
55%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Hamad Medjedovic This prediction relies on player profiles and historical performance up to my last training data update, as the match is scheduled for 2026....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 3.5 Sets Given the best-of-five format of the US Open and the contrasting styles, a competitive match is expected to go beyond three sets. Majchrzak'... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Hamad Medjedovic |
65%
Kamil Majchrzak |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Hamad Medjedovic Hamad Medjedovic is the higher-ranked player and generally has a better recent track record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Kamil Majchrzak Given Medjedovic's slight advantage and the likely competitive nature of the match, it's probable that it will go to two sets. While three s... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Hamad Medjedovic |
55%
over_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Hamad Medjedovic Based on training data through 2025-09, Medjedovic has shown strong form on hard courts, while Majchrzak has struggled with injuries and con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_3.5 Given the expected competitive match and both players' ability to hold serve, a four or five-set match is likely. Majchrzak's experience and... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusHamad Medjedovic 5/5
Medjedovic has shown stronger hard-court form and consistency in recent seasons on the ATP circuit, with a more reliable serve that should t...
Medjedovic is the younger player with higher upside on hard courts based on pre-2024 results. Majchrzak has shown inconsistency in best-of-5...
This prediction relies on player profiles and historical performance up to my last training data update, as the match is scheduled for 2026....
Hamad Medjedovic is the higher-ranked player and generally has a better recent track record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Medjedovic has shown strong form on hard courts, while Majchrzak has struggled with injuries and con...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_3.5 1/10
Both players are mid-tier ATP competitors with serviceable but not dominant games, suggesting tight sets rather than one-sided dismissals. H...
Both players lack sustained top-level experience at slams, favoring a quicker resolution. Hard-court conditions at the US Open typically rew...
Given the best-of-five format of the US Open and the contrasting styles, a competitive match is expected to go beyond three sets. Majchrzak'...
Given Medjedovic's slight advantage and the likely competitive nature of the match, it's probable that it will go to two sets. While three s...
Given the expected competitive match and both players' ability to hold serve, a four or five-set match is likely. Majchrzak's experience and...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Hamad Medjedovic
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Hamad Medjedovic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Hamad Medjedovic
Grok 4 Fast
Hamad Medjedovic
DeepSeek V3
Hamad Medjedovic
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
94873d40be5ce47d…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 15:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31753,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kamil Majchrzak",
"home": "Hamad Medjedovic"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.