Gustavo HeidevsJoel Josef Schwaerzler
JJYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Gustavo Heide 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Gustavo Heide |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Gustavo Heide Heide is the higher-ranked player (typically in the 100–150 ATP range) and more established on hard courts, which is the US Open surface. Sc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 This is a first-round or early-round US Open match between a higher-ranked player (Heide) and a lower-ranked challenger (Schwaerzler). Early... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Gustavo Heide |
62%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Gustavo Heide Training data through 2025-09 shows Gustavo Heide with marginally better hard-court results than Schwaerzler in comparable events. No head-t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_2.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often push matches to deciding sets on outdoor hard courts. US Open conditions typicall... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Gustavo Heide |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Gustavo Heide Gustavo Heide, while primarily a clay-court player, possesses slightly more professional tour experience than the younger Joel Josef Schwaer...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets Given that both players are more accustomed to clay courts and might find consistent dominance challenging on a hard court surface over five... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Gustavo Heide |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Gustavo Heide Gustavo Heide is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Schwaerzler has sh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that this is a Grand Slam match, there is a potential for a longer, more competitive contest, especially if Schwaerzler can capitalize... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Gustavo Heide |
58%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Gustavo Heide Based on training data through mid-2025, Gustavo Heide has stronger results on hard courts and higher overall ranking, while Schwaerzler pri...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 3.5 In first-round Grand Slam matches, especially between closely matched players, four or five sets are common. While Heide is favored, Schwaer... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusGustavo Heide 5/5
Heide is the higher-ranked player (typically in the 100–150 ATP range) and more established on hard courts, which is the US Open surface. Sc...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Gustavo Heide with marginally better hard-court results than Schwaerzler in comparable events. No head-t...
Gustavo Heide, while primarily a clay-court player, possesses slightly more professional tour experience than the younger Joel Josef Schwaer...
Gustavo Heide is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger record on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Schwaerzler has sh...
Based on training data through mid-2025, Gustavo Heide has stronger results on hard courts and higher overall ranking, while Schwaerzler pri...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
This is a first-round or early-round US Open match between a higher-ranked player (Heide) and a lower-ranked challenger (Schwaerzler). Early...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates both players often push matches to deciding sets on outdoor hard courts. US Open conditions typicall...
Given that both players are more accustomed to clay courts and might find consistent dominance challenging on a hard court surface over five...
Given that this is a Grand Slam match, there is a potential for a longer, more competitive contest, especially if Schwaerzler can capitalize...
In first-round Grand Slam matches, especially between closely matched players, four or five sets are common. While Heide is favored, Schwaer...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Gustavo Heide
DeepSeek V3
Gustavo Heide
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gustavo Heide
Grok 4 Fast
Gustavo Heide
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gustavo Heide
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2d61386c032099f8…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30799,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Joel Josef Schwaerzler",
"home": "Gustavo Heide"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.