Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De RealesvsNoma Noha Akugue
NNYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales Both players are on the WTA challenger circuit; Guiomar has more extensive recent tournament exposure and a slightly higher ranking trajecto...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 At the Montreux Nestlé Open (WTA 125K / challenger level), matches are best-of-three sets. Both Guiomar and Noma are competitive on the chal... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
62%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales Guiomar Maristany has shown better recent consistency on clay surfaces typical for Montreux events. Noma Noha Akugue tends to struggle again...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Best-of-3 format favors straight-sets outcomes when one player holds serve more reliably on clay. Maristany's return game should limit exten... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales Based on training data up to my last update, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales generally performs better on clay courts, a likely surface f...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Both players are competitive, and while Maristany holds an advantage on clay, Akugue possesses enough power to challenge and potentially tak... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
65%
Noma Noha Akugue |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales Based on general knowledge up to 2025-09, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales is typically a stronger clay-court player with a higher career...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Noma Noha Akugue Given that Maristany is favored and the likely surface is clay, this match is expected to be competitive. While Maristany is the favorite, N... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
52%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales No live access, so this comes from training knowledge through 2025-09. Maristany is a seasoned Spanish clay/hard-court grinder with stronger...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over 2.5 Both players are counterpunching baseliners without dominant serves, so breaks should be frequent and sets tight. Two evenly matched ITF-lev... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusGuiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales 5/5
Both players are on the WTA challenger circuit; Guiomar has more extensive recent tournament exposure and a slightly higher ranking trajecto...
Guiomar Maristany has shown better recent consistency on clay surfaces typical for Montreux events. Noma Noha Akugue tends to struggle again...
Based on training data up to my last update, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales generally performs better on clay courts, a likely surface f...
Based on general knowledge up to 2025-09, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales is typically a stronger clay-court player with a higher career...
No live access, so this comes from training knowledge through 2025-09. Maristany is a seasoned Spanish clay/hard-court grinder with stronger...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
At the Montreux Nestlé Open (WTA 125K / challenger level), matches are best-of-three sets. Both Guiomar and Noma are competitive on the chal...
Best-of-3 format favors straight-sets outcomes when one player holds serve more reliably on clay. Maristany's return game should limit exten...
Both players are competitive, and while Maristany holds an advantage on clay, Akugue possesses enough power to challenge and potentially tak...
Given that Maristany is favored and the likely surface is clay, this match is expected to be competitive. While Maristany is the favorite, N...
Both players are counterpunching baseliners without dominant serves, so breaks should be frequent and sets tight. Two evenly matched ITF-lev...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
DeepSeek V3
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
Grok 4 Fast
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
136f30423e3d24d6…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 12:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 40421,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T12:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 12:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Noma Noha Akugue",
"home": "Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.