Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De RealesvsMartina Trevisan
MTYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Martina Trevisan 4/5 models |
under_2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Martina Trevisan |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Martina Trevisan Martina Trevisan is a seasoned WTA professional with consistent performances on European clay and hard courts, while Guiomar Maristany Zulet...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At the WTA 125K level, matches typically produce competitive sets with reasonable length, especially when the higher-ranked player (Trevisan... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
Martina Trevisan |
61%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Martina Trevisan Trevisan holds superior ranking and experience entering 2026; Maristany has shown inconsistent results on European clay events. Training dat...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_2.5 Trevisan typically closes matches in straight sets against lower-ranked players. Both athletes prefer baseline rallies on clay that limit ex... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Martina Trevisan |
65%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Martina Trevisan Based on training data up to my last update, Martina Trevisan is a significantly more accomplished clay-court player than Guiomar Maristany...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Given Trevisan's superior skill and experience on clay, she is favored to win this match in straight sets. While Maristany is a clay-court p... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales Based on training data through 2025-09, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales is generally favored in this matchup. Her performance trends sugg...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 This matchup is expected to be competitive, suggesting that it will likely go to three sets. Both players have shown the ability to win sets... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Martina Trevisan |
55%
Under 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Martina Trevisan Based on training data through 2025-09, Martina Trevisan has significantly higher career achievements and experience on clay, which is likel...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 sets Given the significant gap in experience and form, Trevisan is likely to win in straight sets. Maristany is a younger player who may struggle... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusMartina Trevisan 4/5
Martina Trevisan is a seasoned WTA professional with consistent performances on European clay and hard courts, while Guiomar Maristany Zulet...
Trevisan holds superior ranking and experience entering 2026; Maristany has shown inconsistent results on European clay events. Training dat...
Based on training data up to my last update, Martina Trevisan is a significantly more accomplished clay-court player than Guiomar Maristany...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales is generally favored in this matchup. Her performance trends sugg...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Martina Trevisan has significantly higher career achievements and experience on clay, which is likel...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_2.5 1/10
At the WTA 125K level, matches typically produce competitive sets with reasonable length, especially when the higher-ranked player (Trevisan...
Trevisan typically closes matches in straight sets against lower-ranked players. Both athletes prefer baseline rallies on clay that limit ex...
Given Trevisan's superior skill and experience on clay, she is favored to win this match in straight sets. While Maristany is a clay-court p...
This matchup is expected to be competitive, suggesting that it will likely go to three sets. Both players have shown the ability to win sets...
Given the significant gap in experience and form, Trevisan is likely to win in straight sets. Maristany is a younger player who may struggle...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Martina Trevisan
Grok 4 Fast
Martina Trevisan
DeepSeek V3
Martina Trevisan
Claude Haiku 4.5
Martina Trevisan
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b96cff1c398c5e6a…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 10 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39785,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-10T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Martina Trevisan",
"home": "Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.