Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardvsJurij Rodionov
JRAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard 5/5 models |
3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Perricard is a hard-court specialist with a big serve that thrives on fast surfaces like the US Open's DecoTurf. He has shown consistent imp...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 While Perricard's serve dominance suggests a potential straight-sets win, Rodionov is competitive and has the ability to take at least one s... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
68%
under_3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Perricard possesses elite serve power and hard-court movement that outclasses Rodionov based on 2024-2025 form. Rodionov lacks the weapons t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
under_3.5 Perricard's serve dominance typically produces quick sets on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Rodionov has shown vulnerability to... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
72%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Mpetshi Perricard, with his powerful serve and aggressive play, is generally well-suited for hard courts like those at the US Open. Rodionov...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
Over 3.5 Sets Both players are known to be competitive and can push matches to longer durations in a Grand Slam format. While a straight-sets victory is a... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
65%
3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Based on training data, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard generally shows a higher win rate on hard courts compared to Jurij Rodionov. While Rodion...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
3.5 Given Mpetshi Perricard's aggressive style and Rodionov's ability to win sets, this match is likely to go the distance. Mpetshi Perricard's... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard |
55%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard Based on training data through 2025-09, Mpetshi Perricard has a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game that thrives on hard courts, whi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 3.5 With Mpetshi Perricard's dominant serve and Rodionov's relatively weaker return game, the match is likely to feature few breaks and decisive... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusGiovanni Mpetshi Perricard 5/5
Perricard is a hard-court specialist with a big serve that thrives on fast surfaces like the US Open's DecoTurf. He has shown consistent imp...
Perricard possesses elite serve power and hard-court movement that outclasses Rodionov based on 2024-2025 form. Rodionov lacks the weapons t...
Mpetshi Perricard, with his powerful serve and aggressive play, is generally well-suited for hard courts like those at the US Open. Rodionov...
Based on training data, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard generally shows a higher win rate on hard courts compared to Jurij Rodionov. While Rodion...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Mpetshi Perricard has a powerful serve and aggressive baseline game that thrives on hard courts, whi...
Over / Under
Consensus3.5 1/10
While Perricard's serve dominance suggests a potential straight-sets win, Rodionov is competitive and has the ability to take at least one s...
Perricard's serve dominance typically produces quick sets on hard courts against lower-ranked opponents. Rodionov has shown vulnerability to...
Both players are known to be competitive and can push matches to longer durations in a Grand Slam format. While a straight-sets victory is a...
Given Mpetshi Perricard's aggressive style and Rodionov's ability to win sets, this match is likely to go the distance. Mpetshi Perricard's...
With Mpetshi Perricard's dominant serve and Rodionov's relatively weaker return game, the match is likely to feature few breaks and decisive...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
DeepSeek V3
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Claude Haiku 4.5
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c0cab2ec1b5a3f9a…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 17:25 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33694,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Jurij Rodionov",
"home": "Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.