Gael MonfilsvsAdolfo Daniel Vallejo
ADAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Gael Monfils 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
72%
Gael Monfils |
68%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Gael Monfils Monfils is an established ATP tour veteran with multiple Grand Slam quarterfinal appearances and strong hard-court credentials, while Vallej...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Under 3.5 Monfils' superior ranking and consistency should allow him to close out the match in 3 or 4 sets rather than take it to five. Vallejo, if he... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
88%
Gael Monfils |
72%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
88%
Gael Monfils Monfils has far superior experience and hard-court results at the US Open level compared to Vallejo, a lower-ranked player. Training data th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
under 3.5 Monfils typically closes out lesser opponents in straight sets on home-surface hard courts. Vallejo lacks the weapons to push to four or fiv... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Gael Monfils |
70%
Over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Gael Monfils Based on historical performance and general player profiles up to my training data cutoff, Gael Monfils is the more experienced and accompli...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over While Monfils is favored to win, his age and occasional inconsistencies, combined with Vallejo's potential fighting spirit as a younger play... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Gael Monfils |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Gael Monfils Gael Monfils is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts which is the surface f...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given Monfils' experience and potential for Vallejo to put up a fight, this match could go the distance. Monfils is capable of winning in st... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
72%
Gael Monfils |
60%
Under 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Gael Monfils Based on training data through early 2025, Monfils has extensive experience on hard courts and a strong US Open record, while Vallejo is pri...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 3.5 sets Monfils' superior experience and surface comfort should allow him to win in straight sets or in four sets at most, given Vallejo's likely st... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusGael Monfils 5/5
Monfils is an established ATP tour veteran with multiple Grand Slam quarterfinal appearances and strong hard-court credentials, while Vallej...
Monfils has far superior experience and hard-court results at the US Open level compared to Vallejo, a lower-ranked player. Training data th...
Based on historical performance and general player profiles up to my training data cutoff, Gael Monfils is the more experienced and accompli...
Gael Monfils is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the ATP tour, particularly on hard courts which is the surface f...
Based on training data through early 2025, Monfils has extensive experience on hard courts and a strong US Open record, while Vallejo is pri...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Monfils' superior ranking and consistency should allow him to close out the match in 3 or 4 sets rather than take it to five. Vallejo, if he...
Monfils typically closes out lesser opponents in straight sets on home-surface hard courts. Vallejo lacks the weapons to push to four or fiv...
While Monfils is favored to win, his age and occasional inconsistencies, combined with Vallejo's potential fighting spirit as a younger play...
Given Monfils' experience and potential for Vallejo to put up a fight, this match could go the distance. Monfils is capable of winning in st...
Monfils' superior experience and surface comfort should allow him to win in straight sets or in four sets at most, given Vallejo's likely st...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Gael Monfils
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gael Monfils
Claude Haiku 4.5
Gael Monfils
DeepSeek V3
Gael Monfils
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gael Monfils
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
3ac8e2e25567c0d3…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 1 · 23:05 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31745,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Adolfo Daniel Vallejo",
"home": "Gael Monfils"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.