Gabriella Da Silva FickvsElena Malygina
EMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Gabriella Da Silva Fick 4/4 models |
2 2/8 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick |
61%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles. Gabriella Da Silva Fick receives the home pick due to surface fami...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_2.5 Lower-level ITF women's matches on clay frequently finish in straight sets. Neither player has shown exceptional stamina in past results. Tr... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick Based on my training data up to my last update, both players are closely matched on hard courts, the likely surface for this tournament. Gab...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Given the perceived closeness of these two players based on historical performance, a decisive two-set victory for either side is less likel...
1 source cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick |
60%
Elena Malygina |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick Based on training data, Gabriella Da Silva Fick has a slight edge in head-to-head matchups against Elena Malygina. While Malygina is a consi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Elena Malygina Given the close historical matchup and similar recent form, this match is likely to be competitive and go to three sets. While Da Silva Fick... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
64%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick |
55%
Elena Malygina |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
64%
Gabriella Da Silva Fick Training data only, no live access — knowledge cutoff means this 2026 ITF-level result is extrapolated from both players' pre-2026 profiles....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Elena Malygina ITF Ladies Open first-round matches between two hard-court baseliners at similar level usually head to a decider, but the higher-ranked Da S... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusGabriella Da Silva Fick 4/4
Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles. Gabriella Da Silva Fick receives the home pick due to surface fami...
Based on my training data up to my last update, both players are closely matched on hard courts, the likely surface for this tournament. Gab...
Based on training data, Gabriella Da Silva Fick has a slight edge in head-to-head matchups against Elena Malygina. While Malygina is a consi...
Training data only, no live access — knowledge cutoff means this 2026 ITF-level result is extrapolated from both players' pre-2026 profiles....
Over / Under
Consensus2 2/8
Lower-level ITF women's matches on clay frequently finish in straight sets. Neither player has shown exceptional stamina in past results. Tr...
Given the perceived closeness of these two players based on historical performance, a decisive two-set victory for either side is less likel...
Given the close historical matchup and similar recent form, this match is likely to be competitive and go to three sets. While Da Silva Fick...
ITF Ladies Open first-round matches between two hard-court baseliners at similar level usually head to a decider, but the higher-ranked Da S...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Grok 4 Fast
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4ff434630394455b…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 14 · 09:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 43268,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Caldas da Rainha Ladies Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-14T09:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Elena Malygina",
"home": "Gabriella Da Silva Fick"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.