Francisca JorgevsVictoria Jimenez Kasintseva
VJYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
2 1/10 models |
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
56%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
Over 2.5 Jimenez Kasintseva has reliable serve and baseline stability that typically extends matches to at least three sets against qualifying-level...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva has established herself as a solid hard-court competitor with a more consistent WTA ranking trajectory than Fran... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
under_2.5 |
62%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_2.5 Early-round US Open matches between lower-ranked players frequently end in straight sets due to one player struggling with the big-stage pre...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva holds a slight edge in recent junior and ITF hard-court results compared to Francisca Jorge. Both players are lo... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Over 2.5 Sets |
55%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Sets Given the competitive nature expected between these two players and the context of a Grand Slam, a three-set match is highly probable. Franc...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Based on general player profiles from my training data up to my last update, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva, as a highly-regarded young talent,... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva |
65%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Given Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva's higher ranking and probable surface advantage, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. Wh...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva is a higher-ranked player and generally performs better on hard courts, which is likely the surface for the US O... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Under 2.5 |
60%
Francisca Jorge |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Given the likely mismatch in experience and surface preference, I expect Jorge to win in straight sets. However, without current form data,...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Francisca Jorge Training data through 2025-09 suggests Francisca Jorge has more experience on hard courts and a higher ranking, while Jimenez Kasintseva has... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensus2 1/10
Jimenez Kasintseva has reliable serve and baseline stability that typically extends matches to at least three sets against qualifying-level...
Early-round US Open matches between lower-ranked players frequently end in straight sets due to one player struggling with the big-stage pre...
Given the competitive nature expected between these two players and the context of a Grand Slam, a three-set match is highly probable. Franc...
Given Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva's higher ranking and probable surface advantage, it is likely she will win this match in straight sets. Wh...
Given the likely mismatch in experience and surface preference, I expect Jorge to win in straight sets. However, without current form data,...
Match winner
ConsensusVictoria Jimenez Kasintseva 4/5
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva has established herself as a solid hard-court competitor with a more consistent WTA ranking trajectory than Fran...
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva holds a slight edge in recent junior and ITF hard-court results compared to Francisca Jorge. Both players are lo...
Based on general player profiles from my training data up to my last update, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva, as a highly-regarded young talent,...
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva is a higher-ranked player and generally performs better on hard courts, which is likely the surface for the US O...
Training data through 2025-09 suggests Francisca Jorge has more experience on hard courts and a higher ranking, while Jimenez Kasintseva has...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Claude Haiku 4.5
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Grok 4 Fast
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
DeepSeek V3
Francisca Jorge
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0c79577a7979e98c…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30817,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva",
"home": "Francisca Jorge"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.