Francesca JonesvsIva Jovic
IJAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Francesca Jones 5/5 models |
Over 2.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Francesca Jones |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones has significantly more WTA-level experience and a higher ranking than Iva Jovic as of my last training data (through Septemb...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Both players are hard-court specialists with competitive serves and baseline stability, suggesting competitive sets rather than one-sided do... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Francesca Jones |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones holds a modest edge in hard-court experience and movement from training data through late 2023; Iva Jovic remains a raw pros...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Best-of-three format on hard courts tends to produce straight-set wins when one player holds serve reliably; Jones serve metrics suggest she... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Francesca Jones |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Francesca Jones This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the match is in the future (2026-09-03). Francesca Jones, while facing...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Predicting over 2.5 sets, meaning the match will go to three sets. While Jones is favored, Jovic is a talented young player with the potenti... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Francesca Jones |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Francesca Jones Francesca Jones is the higher-ranked player and has more experience on the professional tour, suggesting she should have the edge in this ma...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 Given that Francesca Jones is the favorite but Iva Jovic is a promising player, this match has the potential to go to three sets. Jones's ex... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Francesca Jones |
60%
over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Francesca Jones Predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Francesca Jones has more experience on hard courts and in Grand Slam main draws, while I...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over 2.5 Given the relative inexperience of Iva Jovic and Francesca Jones's fighting style, this match is likely to be competitive. Jovic's powerful... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFrancesca Jones 5/5
Francesca Jones has significantly more WTA-level experience and a higher ranking than Iva Jovic as of my last training data (through Septemb...
Francesca Jones holds a modest edge in hard-court experience and movement from training data through late 2023; Iva Jovic remains a raw pros...
This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the match is in the future (2026-09-03). Francesca Jones, while facing...
Francesca Jones is the higher-ranked player and has more experience on the professional tour, suggesting she should have the edge in this ma...
Predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Francesca Jones has more experience on hard courts and in Grand Slam main draws, while I...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/10
Both players are hard-court specialists with competitive serves and baseline stability, suggesting competitive sets rather than one-sided do...
Best-of-three format on hard courts tends to produce straight-set wins when one player holds serve reliably; Jones serve metrics suggest she...
Predicting over 2.5 sets, meaning the match will go to three sets. While Jones is favored, Jovic is a talented young player with the potenti...
Given that Francesca Jones is the favorite but Iva Jovic is a promising player, this match has the potential to go to three sets. Jones's ex...
Given the relative inexperience of Iva Jovic and Francesca Jones's fighting style, this match is likely to be competitive. Jovic's powerful...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Francesca Jones
Claude Haiku 4.5
Francesca Jones
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Francesca Jones
Grok 4 Fast
Francesca Jones
DeepSeek V3
Francesca Jones
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5d2a1fae802f84f6…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 3 · 22:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35681,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-03T20:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Iva Jovic",
"home": "Francesca Jones"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.