Francesca CurmivsNuria Brancaccio
NBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Francesca Curmi 3/5 models |
Over 20.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Francesca Curmi |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Francesca Curmi Both players are relatively low-ranked professionals competing in a secondary WTA 125K circuit event. Curmi, an Italian player, shows slight...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 At this level of professional tennis, matches between similarly-ranked players on hard courts tend to be competitive and reach 3 sets more o... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Francesca Curmi |
61%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Francesca Curmi Francesca Curmi holds a slight edge on clay surfaces based on prior ITF-level results against similar opponents. Nuria Brancaccio has shown...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under_2.5 Both players prefer baseline rallies on clay that often produce straight-set outcomes at this level. Curmi's serve efficiency in prior match... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Nuria Brancaccio |
55%
Over 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Nuria Brancaccio This prediction is based on general player profiles and career trajectories from my training data, as specific match details for 2026 are un...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Sets Despite Brancaccio being the favorite, Curmi is a resilient player capable of challenging stronger opponents and taking a set, especially if...
1 source cited
|
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Curmi |
65%
Nuria Brancaccio |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Curmi Francesca Curmi and Nuria Brancaccio have similar career trajectories and recent form on clay, with both players reaching ITF finals or quar...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Nuria Brancaccio Given the closely matched nature of these two players, especially on their preferred surface of clay, it's highly probable that this match w...
4 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Francesca Curmi |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Francesca Curmi Based on training data through early 2025, Francesca Curmi has shown slightly better form on clay, which is likely the surface here given th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 Both players are competitive at this level, and matches in such tournaments often go to three sets due to the evenly matched nature. Curmi a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFrancesca Curmi 3/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked professionals competing in a secondary WTA 125K circuit event. Curmi, an Italian player, shows slight...
Francesca Curmi holds a slight edge on clay surfaces based on prior ITF-level results against similar opponents. Nuria Brancaccio has shown...
This prediction is based on general player profiles and career trajectories from my training data, as specific match details for 2026 are un...
Francesca Curmi and Nuria Brancaccio have similar career trajectories and recent form on clay, with both players reaching ITF finals or quar...
Based on training data through early 2025, Francesca Curmi has shown slightly better form on clay, which is likely the surface here given th...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 20.5 2/10
At this level of professional tennis, matches between similarly-ranked players on hard courts tend to be competitive and reach 3 sets more o...
Both players prefer baseline rallies on clay that often produce straight-set outcomes at this level. Curmi's serve efficiency in prior match...
Despite Brancaccio being the favorite, Curmi is a resilient player capable of challenging stronger opponents and taking a set, especially if...
Given the closely matched nature of these two players, especially on their preferred surface of clay, it's highly probable that this match w...
Both players are competitive at this level, and matches in such tournaments often go to three sets due to the evenly matched nature. Curmi a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Francesca Curmi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Nuria Brancaccio
Claude Haiku 4.5
Francesca Curmi
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Curmi
Grok 4 Fast
Francesca Curmi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
41795514b395d738…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Sep 7 · 15:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 38938,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-07T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Nuria Brancaccio",
"home": "Francesca Curmi"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.