Frances TiafoevsDaniil Medvedev
DMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Daniil Medvedev 5/5 models |
Over 3.5 Sets 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Daniil Medvedev |
58%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev has historically dominated Tiafoe in head-to-head matchups and holds a significant edge on hard courts, where his defensive baselin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 3.5 Both players are capable of extended baseline rallies and neither is prone to quick dismissals. Tiafoe has improved his court coverage and s... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Daniil Medvedev |
58%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniil Medvedev Medvedev holds a strong head-to-head edge over Tiafoe on hard courts and has superior movement and serve consistency at Grand Slams. Tiafoe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Both players possess powerful serves that limit break opportunities, often extending matches. Medvedev's baseline resilience tends to push c... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Daniil Medvedev |
60%
Over 3.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Daniil Medvedev Daniil Medvedev's consistent baseline game, exceptional return, and proven track record on hard courts, including a US Open title, make him...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Sets Given this is a Grand Slam best-of-five match, it's common for both players to win at least one set, even when there's a clear favorite. Fra... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Daniil Medvedev |
60%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Daniil Medvedev Daniil Medvedev has a strong record at the US Open, having won the title in 2021 and reaching the final in 2022. While Frances Tiafoe also h...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.0 While both players are capable of taking sets, Medvedev's superior consistency and ability to grind out wins suggest he is more likely to wi...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Daniil Medvedev |
55%
over_4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Daniil Medvedev Based on training data through 2025-09, Medvedev has a superior hard-court record and has historically performed well at the US Open, where...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over_4.5 Both players possess strong service games and are capable of winning long tiebreaks. Tiafoe's aggressive style can trouble Medvedev, leading... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusDaniil Medvedev 5/5
Medvedev has historically dominated Tiafoe in head-to-head matchups and holds a significant edge on hard courts, where his defensive baselin...
Medvedev holds a strong head-to-head edge over Tiafoe on hard courts and has superior movement and serve consistency at Grand Slams. Tiafoe...
Daniil Medvedev's consistent baseline game, exceptional return, and proven track record on hard courts, including a US Open title, make him...
Daniil Medvedev has a strong record at the US Open, having won the title in 2021 and reaching the final in 2022. While Frances Tiafoe also h...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Medvedev has a superior hard-court record and has historically performed well at the US Open, where...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 Sets 1/10
Both players are capable of extended baseline rallies and neither is prone to quick dismissals. Tiafoe has improved his court coverage and s...
Both players possess powerful serves that limit break opportunities, often extending matches. Medvedev's baseline resilience tends to push c...
Given this is a Grand Slam best-of-five match, it's common for both players to win at least one set, even when there's a clear favorite. Fra...
While both players are capable of taking sets, Medvedev's superior consistency and ability to grind out wins suggest he is more likely to wi...
Both players possess strong service games and are capable of winning long tiebreaks. Tiafoe's aggressive style can trouble Medvedev, leading...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Daniil Medvedev
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Daniil Medvedev
Claude Haiku 4.5
Daniil Medvedev
Grok 4 Fast
Daniil Medvedev
DeepSeek V3
Daniil Medvedev
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d8f13093fa048879…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Sep 6 · 19:35 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 37732,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-06T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 06 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Daniil Medvedev",
"home": "Frances Tiafoe"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.