Flavio CobollivsTristan Schoolkate
TSAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Flavio Cobolli 4/5 models |
Over 3.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Flavio Cobolli |
62%
Under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Flavio Cobolli Cobolli is an established ATP player (ranked ~30–50 range in recent seasons) with solid hard-court credentials and US Open experience, while...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 3.5 Cobolli's serve and court positioning should allow him to control rallies and avoid extended tiebreaks against a qualifier-level opponent. W... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Flavio Cobolli |
61%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Flavio Cobolli Cobolli holds a substantial ranking and experience edge over Schoolkate on hard courts. Schoolkate has shown limited success against top-50...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under 3.5 Cobolli typically closes out lesser opponents in straight or four sets on hard. Schoolkate lacks the weapons to force a fifth set against th... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Tristan Schoolkate |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Tristan Schoolkate This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future. Tristan Schoo...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Despite Schoolkate's advantage on hard courts, Cobolli is a tenacious competitor capable of pushing matches and snatching a set. While Schoo... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Flavio Cobolli |
60%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Flavio Cobolli Based on training data, Flavio Cobolli is generally a stronger player on hard courts than Tristan Schoolkate. Cobolli has shown more consist...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
2.5 The match is expected to be contested, but Cobolli's higher ranking and hard court prowess suggest he will likely prevail in three sets. Whi... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Flavio Cobolli |
70%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Flavio Cobolli Flavio Cobolli is a higher-ranked player with more experience on hard courts, while Tristan Schoolkate is a wildcard entrant with limited Gr...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 3.5 Cobolli is favored but Schoolkate's big serve and aggressive play could steal a set, especially if the match goes to tiebreaks. In best-of-f... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFlavio Cobolli 4/5
Cobolli is an established ATP player (ranked ~30–50 range in recent seasons) with solid hard-court credentials and US Open experience, while...
Cobolli holds a substantial ranking and experience edge over Schoolkate on hard courts. Schoolkate has shown limited success against top-50...
This prediction is based on general player profiles from my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future. Tristan Schoo...
Based on training data, Flavio Cobolli is generally a stronger player on hard courts than Tristan Schoolkate. Cobolli has shown more consist...
Flavio Cobolli is a higher-ranked player with more experience on hard courts, while Tristan Schoolkate is a wildcard entrant with limited Gr...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 3.5 2/10
Cobolli's serve and court positioning should allow him to control rallies and avoid extended tiebreaks against a qualifier-level opponent. W...
Cobolli typically closes out lesser opponents in straight or four sets on hard. Schoolkate lacks the weapons to force a fifth set against th...
Despite Schoolkate's advantage on hard courts, Cobolli is a tenacious competitor capable of pushing matches and snatching a set. While Schoo...
The match is expected to be contested, but Cobolli's higher ranking and hard court prowess suggest he will likely prevail in three sets. Whi...
Cobolli is favored but Schoolkate's big serve and aggressive play could steal a set, especially if the match goes to tiebreaks. In best-of-f...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Flavio Cobolli
DeepSeek V3
Flavio Cobolli
Claude Haiku 4.5
Flavio Cobolli
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Tristan Schoolkate
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Flavio Cobolli
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8a73a47866cfc543…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 3 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 35177,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-02T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 02 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tristan Schoolkate",
"home": "Flavio Cobolli"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.