Fiona FerrovsRebecca Marino
RMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over_2.5 2/10 models |
Fiona Ferro 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Under 2.5 |
62%
Fiona Ferro |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Women's singles at US Open typically go 2–0 or 2–1 when there is a clear ranking gap; Ferro's superiority in serve and hard-court movement s...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Fiona Ferro Fiona Ferro is a hard-court specialist with stronger recent ATP ranking and serve consistency on US Open surfaces; she typically commands 60... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
over_2.5 |
58%
Rebecca Marino |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over_2.5 Training data through 2024 shows both players frequently push matches to three sets on hard courts due to comparable break-point conversion...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Rebecca Marino Training data through 2024 shows Rebecca Marino holding a slight edge on hard courts with stronger recent serve metrics against similar oppo... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Under 2.5 Sets |
60%
Rebecca Marino |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Rebecca Marino's hard-court prowess and strong serving ability, she has a good chance to secure a straight-sets victory, indicating 'U...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Rebecca Marino Based on training data up to my last update, Rebecca Marino's powerful serve and aggressive groundstrokes are particularly effective on hard... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over |
65%
Fiona Ferro |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The matchup between Ferro and Marino is expected to be closely contested, suggesting that it is likely to go to three sets. Both players hav...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Fiona Ferro Based on training data up to 2025, Fiona Ferro has historically shown a slight edge in performance against Rebecca Marino, particularly on h... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
over_21.5 |
58%
Fiona Ferro |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_21.5 Given the likelihood of a three-set match, the total games are expected to exceed 21.5. Both players have close service holds and break oppo...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Fiona Ferro Based on training data through early 2025, Ferro has shown better form on hard courts and a more consistent return game. Marino relies heavi... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover_2.5 2/10
Women's singles at US Open typically go 2–0 or 2–1 when there is a clear ranking gap; Ferro's superiority in serve and hard-court movement s...
Training data through 2024 shows both players frequently push matches to three sets on hard courts due to comparable break-point conversion...
Given Rebecca Marino's hard-court prowess and strong serving ability, she has a good chance to secure a straight-sets victory, indicating 'U...
The matchup between Ferro and Marino is expected to be closely contested, suggesting that it is likely to go to three sets. Both players hav...
Given the likelihood of a three-set match, the total games are expected to exceed 21.5. Both players have close service holds and break oppo...
Match winner
ConsensusFiona Ferro 3/5
Fiona Ferro is a hard-court specialist with stronger recent ATP ranking and serve consistency on US Open surfaces; she typically commands 60...
Training data through 2024 shows Rebecca Marino holding a slight edge on hard courts with stronger recent serve metrics against similar oppo...
Based on training data up to my last update, Rebecca Marino's powerful serve and aggressive groundstrokes are particularly effective on hard...
Based on training data up to 2025, Fiona Ferro has historically shown a slight edge in performance against Rebecca Marino, particularly on h...
Based on training data through early 2025, Ferro has shown better form on hard courts and a more consistent return game. Marino relies heavi...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Fiona Ferro
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fiona Ferro
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Rebecca Marino
Grok 4 Fast
Rebecca Marino
DeepSeek V3
Fiona Ferro
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
eed6fdd8c260c7fd…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 15:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30809,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T15:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Rebecca Marino",
"home": "Fiona Ferro"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.