Fiona FerrovsDalma Galfi
DGYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Fiona Ferro 4/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Fiona Ferro |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Fiona Ferro Fiona Ferro is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger recent record on hard courts, which is the likely surface for the Montreux Nestlé...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Ferro vs Galfi is a competitive mid-tier WTA matchup where both players have the defensive consistency and break-point conversion ability to... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Fiona Ferro |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Fiona Ferro Fiona Ferro has stronger clay-court results in training data through 2023 and better movement on slow European surfaces. Dalma Galfi shows i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players have service games that hold reasonably on clay allowing for straight-sets outcomes. Ferro's experience suggests she can close... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Fiona Ferro |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Fiona Ferro This prediction is based on general historical performance and playing styles from my training data, as live data for a 2026 event is not av...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Considering both players can be inconsistent and matches often feature momentum shifts, a three-set encounter is quite probable. While Ferro... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Fiona Ferro |
60%
Dalma Galfi |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Fiona Ferro Fiona Ferro has a historical advantage on clay courts, which is the likely surface for this event. Her recent form, although not stellar, is...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Dalma Galfi While Ferro is the favorite, Galfi is capable of taking a set, especially if Ferro has an off day or if Galfi finds her rhythm. The head-to-...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
56%
Dalma Galfi |
52%
Under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
56%
Dalma Galfi No live access, so this is from training data through 2025-09; both players are ITF/Challenger-level with limited WTA main-tour form. Galfi'...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under 2.5 With two evenly-matched lower-tier players, a straight-sets result is only slightly favored over a decider. Training-data view through 2025-... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFiona Ferro 4/5
Fiona Ferro is the higher-ranked player and has a stronger recent record on hard courts, which is the likely surface for the Montreux Nestlé...
Fiona Ferro has stronger clay-court results in training data through 2023 and better movement on slow European surfaces. Dalma Galfi shows i...
This prediction is based on general historical performance and playing styles from my training data, as live data for a 2026 event is not av...
Fiona Ferro has a historical advantage on clay courts, which is the likely surface for this event. Her recent form, although not stellar, is...
No live access, so this is from training data through 2025-09; both players are ITF/Challenger-level with limited WTA main-tour form. Galfi'...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Ferro vs Galfi is a competitive mid-tier WTA matchup where both players have the defensive consistency and break-point conversion ability to...
Both players have service games that hold reasonably on clay allowing for straight-sets outcomes. Ferro's experience suggests she can close...
Considering both players can be inconsistent and matches often feature momentum shifts, a three-set encounter is quite probable. While Ferro...
While Ferro is the favorite, Galfi is capable of taking a set, especially if Ferro has an off day or if Galfi finds her rhythm. The head-to-...
With two evenly-matched lower-tier players, a straight-sets result is only slightly favored over a decider. Training-data view through 2025-...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Fiona Ferro
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fiona Ferro
Grok 4 Fast
Fiona Ferro
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Fiona Ferro
DeepSeek V3
Dalma Galfi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0015cd2253cbb985…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 14:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 42026,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Montreux Nestlé Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T14:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Dalma Galfi",
"home": "Fiona Ferro"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.