Fiona CrawleyvsSimona Waltert
SWYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Fiona Crawley 3/5 models |
under 3/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Fiona Crawley |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Fiona Crawley Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA prospects with limited public match history in my training data (through 2025-09). The Ennoble Ca...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Lower-ranked WTA players typically produce competitive but not dominant performances, often extending matches to three sets or closer scorel... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Fiona Crawley |
58%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Fiona Crawley Fiona Crawley is the home player in a US-based event and likely benefits from familiarity with the conditions. Simona Waltert has limited pu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Best-of-3 format means most matches finish in straight sets at this level. Crawley as slight favorite is expected to close efficiently witho... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Simona Waltert |
55%
Over 2.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Simona Waltert Based on training data up to my last knowledge cutoff (pre-2026), Simona Waltert generally possesses more experience on the professional tou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 sets Given the anticipated close nature of this match, with both players being competitive on hard courts, it is reasonable to expect the match t... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Crawley |
70%
Simona Waltert |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Crawley Fiona Crawley enters this match in strong form, having recently secured a significant title. Simona Waltert has shown flashes of talent but...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Simona Waltert Given Crawley's current form and Waltert's inconsistency, a straight-sets victory for Crawley is the most probable outcome. While Waltert is... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Fiona Crawley |
55%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Fiona Crawley Based on training data up to September 2025, Fiona Crawley has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, particularly in ITF and WTA events...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_2.5 Given that both players are solid but not dominant servers, and this is a WTA-style match on a fast hard court, the match is likely to be de... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusFiona Crawley 3/5
Both players are relatively low-ranked WTA prospects with limited public match history in my training data (through 2025-09). The Ennoble Ca...
Fiona Crawley is the home player in a US-based event and likely benefits from familiarity with the conditions. Simona Waltert has limited pu...
Based on training data up to my last knowledge cutoff (pre-2026), Simona Waltert generally possesses more experience on the professional tou...
Fiona Crawley enters this match in strong form, having recently secured a significant title. Simona Waltert has shown flashes of talent but...
Based on training data up to September 2025, Fiona Crawley has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, particularly in ITF and WTA events...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3/10
Lower-ranked WTA players typically produce competitive but not dominant performances, often extending matches to three sets or closer scorel...
Best-of-3 format means most matches finish in straight sets at this level. Crawley as slight favorite is expected to close efficiently witho...
Given the anticipated close nature of this match, with both players being competitive on hard courts, it is reasonable to expect the match t...
Given Crawley's current form and Waltert's inconsistency, a straight-sets victory for Crawley is the most probable outcome. While Waltert is...
Given that both players are solid but not dominant servers, and this is a WTA-style match on a fast hard court, the match is likely to be de...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Crawley
DeepSeek V3
Fiona Crawley
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fiona Crawley
Grok 4 Fast
Fiona Crawley
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Simona Waltert
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9c9421c542561ccf…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30549,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Simona Waltert",
"home": "Fiona Crawley"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.