Fernanda LabranavsWhitney Osuigwe
WOYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Whitney Osuigwe 3/5 models |
Over 2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Fernanda Labrana |
58%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Fernanda Labrana Fernanda Labrana is the higher-ranked player and has more established professional experience on the WTA circuit. Whitney Osuigwe is a young...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Without surface type or specific tournament format confirmed, a best-of-3 sets format is standard for women's tennis. Labrana vs. Osuigwe is... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Whitney Osuigwe |
57%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Whitney Osuigwe Whitney Osuigwe has the stronger professional pedigree and surface experience on hard courts compared with Fernanda Labrana based on trainin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over_2.5 Best-of-three format on hard favors three sets when the underdog holds serve well enough to force a decider. Training data through 2025-09 s... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Whitney Osuigwe |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Whitney Osuigwe Based on training data up to my last update, Whitney Osuigwe holds a significantly higher career-best ranking and has more experience compet...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Whitney Osuigwe's superior talent and experience, she is expected to secure a straight-sets victory in this best-of-three match. While... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Fernanda Labrana |
60%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Fernanda Labrana Based on training data through 2025-09, Fernanda Labrana has a stronger historical performance and a higher perceived skill level compared t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given the slight uncertainty and potential for a competitive match, the total sets are likely to go over 2.5. This accounts for the possibil... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
Whitney Osuigwe |
54%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Whitney Osuigwe No live access, predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Osuigwe is a former junior world No. 1 and Roland Garros girls champion...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Over 2.5 With no live data, base rates for evenly matched ITF-level hard-court matches suggest a high chance of a deciding set. Both players lack dom... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusWhitney Osuigwe 3/5
Fernanda Labrana is the higher-ranked player and has more established professional experience on the WTA circuit. Whitney Osuigwe is a young...
Whitney Osuigwe has the stronger professional pedigree and surface experience on hard courts compared with Fernanda Labrana based on trainin...
Based on training data up to my last update, Whitney Osuigwe holds a significantly higher career-best ranking and has more experience compet...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Fernanda Labrana has a stronger historical performance and a higher perceived skill level compared t...
No live access, predicting from training knowledge through 2025-09. Osuigwe is a former junior world No. 1 and Roland Garros girls champion...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 2/10
Without surface type or specific tournament format confirmed, a best-of-3 sets format is standard for women's tennis. Labrana vs. Osuigwe is...
Best-of-three format on hard favors three sets when the underdog holds serve well enough to force a decider. Training data through 2025-09 s...
Given Whitney Osuigwe's superior talent and experience, she is expected to secure a straight-sets victory in this best-of-three match. While...
Given the slight uncertainty and potential for a competitive match, the total sets are likely to go over 2.5. This accounts for the possibil...
With no live data, base rates for evenly matched ITF-level hard-court matches suggest a high chance of a deciding set. Both players lack dom...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Whitney Osuigwe
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Fernanda Labrana
Claude Haiku 4.5
Fernanda Labrana
Grok 4 Fast
Whitney Osuigwe
DeepSeek V3
Whitney Osuigwe
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
9342aab6da4b6cc7…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 12 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 42034,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "SP Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-12T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Whitney Osuigwe",
"home": "Fernanda Labrana"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.