Federico CinavsLuca Nardi
LNYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Luca Nardi 5/5 models |
over 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Luca Nardi |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Luca Nardi Both are lower-ranked Italian players competing at the US Open on hard court. Nardi has shown slightly more consistency on the ATP tour and...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 US Open matches are best-of-5 for men, creating structural incentive for longer contests. Both Cina and Nardi are ranked outside the top 100... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Luca Nardi |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Luca Nardi Luca Nardi has more professional experience and a higher ranking than the younger Federico Cina as of late 2025. On hard courts Nardi has sh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both players are young and aggressive baseliners who tend to produce longer sets on outdoor hard courts. Limited head-to-head suggests compe... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Luca Nardi |
45%
4 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Luca Nardi Luca Nardi is generally a higher-ranked and more experienced player on the ATP tour compared to Federico Cina. Nardi's game, particularly on...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
45%
4 sets While Luca Nardi is favored, Grand Slams often see a lower-ranked player manage to take at least one set, even against a stronger opponent.... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
85%
Luca Nardi |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Luca Nardi Luca Nardi is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established professional career, including a Challenger title. Federico Cina's...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given Nardi's significant advantage, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, Cina might manage to take a set, especially if Nardi has...
2 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Luca Nardi |
65%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Luca Nardi Based on training data through 2025-09, Luca Nardi is a more established ATP player with higher ranking and experience on hard courts. Feder...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 3.5 In best-of-five matches, especially in early rounds of a Grand Slam, encounters often extend beyond three sets due to competitive gaps and p... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusLuca Nardi 5/5
Both are lower-ranked Italian players competing at the US Open on hard court. Nardi has shown slightly more consistency on the ATP tour and...
Luca Nardi has more professional experience and a higher ranking than the younger Federico Cina as of late 2025. On hard courts Nardi has sh...
Luca Nardi is generally a higher-ranked and more experienced player on the ATP tour compared to Federico Cina. Nardi's game, particularly on...
Luca Nardi is significantly higher ranked and has a much more established professional career, including a Challenger title. Federico Cina's...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Luca Nardi is a more established ATP player with higher ranking and experience on hard courts. Feder...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
US Open matches are best-of-5 for men, creating structural incentive for longer contests. Both Cina and Nardi are ranked outside the top 100...
Both players are young and aggressive baseliners who tend to produce longer sets on outdoor hard courts. Limited head-to-head suggests compe...
While Luca Nardi is favored, Grand Slams often see a lower-ranked player manage to take at least one set, even against a stronger opponent....
Given Nardi's significant advantage, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, Cina might manage to take a set, especially if Nardi has...
In best-of-five matches, especially in early rounds of a Grand Slam, encounters often extend beyond three sets due to competitive gaps and p...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Luca Nardi
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Luca Nardi
Grok 4 Fast
Luca Nardi
DeepSeek V3
Luca Nardi
Claude Haiku 4.5
Luca Nardi
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
235c7f3b7129742c…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Aug 25 · 04:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30802,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-25T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 25 Aug 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Luca Nardi",
"home": "Federico Cina"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.