Federico CinavsAlex Michelsen
AMAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Alex Michelsen 4/5 models |
over 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Alex Michelsen |
55%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Alex Michelsen Michelsen is a rising American hard-court player with stronger ATP-level experience and more consistent results on US Open-type surfaces com...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 In a best-of-3 format, the match is more likely to go to a tiebreak or competitive third set than a straight two-set victory. Michelsen's sl... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
78%
Alex Michelsen |
58%
over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Alex Michelsen Training data through 2025-09 shows Michelsen with superior hard-court results and ATP experience versus Cina's junior-level background. Sur...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over 3.5 Training data through 2025-09 indicates Michelsen typically wins in 4 sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard. Best-of-5 format plus Cin... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Alex Michelsen |
40%
4 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Alex Michelsen Alex Michelsen, an American player, is generally more accustomed and proficient on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Federi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
40%
4 While Alex Michelsen is favored due to his hard-court proficiency, Federico Cina is likely to compete fiercely in a Grand Slam, potentially... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Alex Michelsen |
55%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Alex Michelsen Based on my training data, Alex Michelsen is generally a more established and higher-ranked player than Federico Cina, especially on hard co...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
2.5 Given Michelsen is the favored player, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, Cina may be capable of taking a set, especially if Mic... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Federico Cina |
60%
Over 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Federico Cina Based on my training data through 2025-09, Federico Cina has shown stronger consistency and a more reliable baseline game on hard courts, wh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 Both players are evenly matched in terms of overall level, and matches between them in the past have frequently gone to four or five sets. M... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAlex Michelsen 4/5
Michelsen is a rising American hard-court player with stronger ATP-level experience and more consistent results on US Open-type surfaces com...
Training data through 2025-09 shows Michelsen with superior hard-court results and ATP experience versus Cina's junior-level background. Sur...
Alex Michelsen, an American player, is generally more accustomed and proficient on hard courts, which is the surface for the US Open. Federi...
Based on my training data, Alex Michelsen is generally a more established and higher-ranked player than Federico Cina, especially on hard co...
Based on my training data through 2025-09, Federico Cina has shown stronger consistency and a more reliable baseline game on hard courts, wh...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3.5 1/10
In a best-of-3 format, the match is more likely to go to a tiebreak or competitive third set than a straight two-set victory. Michelsen's sl...
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Michelsen typically wins in 4 sets against lower-ranked opponents on hard. Best-of-5 format plus Cin...
While Alex Michelsen is favored due to his hard-court proficiency, Federico Cina is likely to compete fiercely in a Grand Slam, potentially...
Given Michelsen is the favored player, a straight-sets victory is plausible. However, Cina may be capable of taking a set, especially if Mic...
Both players are evenly matched in terms of overall level, and matches between them in the past have frequently gone to four or five sets. M...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Alex Michelsen
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Alex Michelsen
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Alex Michelsen
Claude Haiku 4.5
Alex Michelsen
DeepSeek V3
Federico Cina
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
48ac5e7ef7ca658f…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 17:55 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33686,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T21:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Alex Michelsen",
"home": "Federico Cina"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.