FC Carl Zeiss JenavsSV Darmstadt 98
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
SV Darmstadt 98 3/4 models |
SV Darmstadt 98 3/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
yes 3/4 models |
SV Darmstadt 98 3/4 models |
SV Darmstadt 98 1/4 models |
Draw / SV Darmstadt 98 2/4 models |
1-2 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
67%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
53%
over |
51%
yes |
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
58%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
32%
Draw / SV Darmstadt 98 |
18%
1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt operate at a higher professional level than regional side Jena and hold superior squad depth. Home cup upsets are possible but his...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
67%
SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt expected to avoid defeat against lower-league opposition. Rest days are similar so no major fatigue edge. Training data through 20...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Cup matches between mismatched sides often open up after the first goal. Both teams show decent recent scoring rates in provided form. Train...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
yes Jena likely to score at home while Darmstadt attack should find chances. Set-piece threat noted in both squads. Training data through 2025-0...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt quality suggests they cover the spread despite venue. Limited recent H2H data available. Training data through 2025-09.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
58%
SV Darmstadt 98 Asian line likely favors the professional side. Home side may struggle to break down organized defense. Training data through 2025-09.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
32%
Draw / SV Darmstadt 98 Jena may hold early but Darmstadt quality expected to tell later. Similar rest favors controlled approach. Training data through 2025-09.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Low-scoring away win most probable outcome given level difference. Set pieces could decide narrow result. Training data through 2025-09. |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
85%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
60%
Over 2.5 |
55%
Yes |
50%
SV Darmstadt 98 -1 |
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 -1.0 |
45%
SV Darmstadt 98 / SV Darmstadt 98 |
18%
1-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
SV Darmstadt 98 Given the match date in August 2026, I am relying on my training data up to my last update. Historically, SV Darmstadt 98 operates in higher...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
SV Darmstadt 98 Based on historical context and general team strength differences, SV Darmstadt 98 is the stronger side. The draw no bet market provides sec...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 While specific 2026 form is unavailable, the provided hypothetical form suggests Darmstadt has a strong attack (scored 13 in 5 matches). Aga...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
Yes Darmstadt's provided form indicates they conceded 6 goals in 5 matches, suggesting their defense isn't impenetrable. FC Carl Zeiss Jena, pla...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
SV Darmstadt 98 -1 Given Darmstadt's superior historical league standing and strong attacking form (13 goals in 5 matches) against a lower-tier opponent, they...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 -1.0 This market is similar to the spreads, requiring Darmstadt to win by at least two goals for a full win. Given their historical advantage in...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
SV Darmstadt 98 / SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt, as the superior team, is expected to establish dominance early in the match and maintain it throughout. While cup upsets or a slo...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-3 Considering Darmstadt's superior quality and attacking form, they are likely to score multiple goals. Jena's home advantage and recent scori... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
60%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
55%
over |
58%
yes |
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
60%
away_ 0.0 |
35%
Draw / SV Darmstadt 98 |
15%
1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt 98, playing in a higher division, is expected to have a stronger squad than FC Carl Zeiss Jena. While Jena has a decent home recor...
2 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
SV Darmstadt 98 Given Darmstadt's superior league standing and perceived squad depth, they are the more likely winners. The draw no bet market mitigates the...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score in recent matches, and cup games often see more attacking play. While Jena's defense has been soli...
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes Jena has a decent scoring record at home, and Darmstadt, despite being the favorite, is likely to concede at least one goal, especially in a...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
SV Darmstadt 98 FC Carl Zeiss Jena is playing at home, but Darmstadt 98 is the stronger team. While a -1 handicap is significant, Darmstadt's attacking pres...
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
away_ 0.0 This is equivalent to the draw no bet market. Given Darmstadt's stronger pedigree and form, they are favored to get at least a draw, if not...
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / SV Darmstadt 98 Darmstadt is expected to win, but Jena is capable of putting up a fight, especially at home. It's plausible that the first half ends in a dr...
2 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Considering Darmstadt's slight advantage and the expectation of both teams scoring, a close game is likely. A 1-2 scoreline reflects Darmsta...
2 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
50%
FC Carl Zeiss Jena |
55%
FC Carl Zeiss Jena |
55%
over |
60%
yes |
45%
SV Darmstadt 98 |
60%
home_ +0.5 |
30%
draw_home |
15%
1-1 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
FC Carl Zeiss Jena Carl Zeiss Jena are at home with a solid recent record (3-0-2 in last five) and an extra rest day. Darmstadt have been inconsistent on the r...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
FC Carl Zeiss Jena Without the draw outcome, the home side still holds a slight edge based on form and venue. Darmstadt have quality but have shown inconsisten...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown scoring ability (Jena 8 goals in 5, Darmstadt 13 in 5) and their defenses are not particularly strong (Jena conceding...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams have been scoring regularly, and each has shown defensive vulnerabilities. Darmstadt's away matches tend to see goals at both end...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
SV Darmstadt 98 Away -1 requires Darmstadt to win by at least two goals, which is a tall order given their inconsistent form. Jena are unlikely to be blown...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
home_ +0.5 With the +0.5 handicap, Jena only need a draw to cover, which aligns with the expectation of a tight contest. Darmstadt's away form is not d...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
draw_home Given the tight nature of the match, a draw at half-time is plausible. Jena might forge ahead in the second half with home support, making d...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-1 A 1-1 draw is a common scoreline in evenly matched cup ties, considering both teams' scoring and defensive records. Other probable scores in... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusSV Darmstadt 98 3/4
Darmstadt operate at a higher professional level than regional side Jena and hold superior squad depth. Home cup upsets are possible but his...
Given the match date in August 2026, I am relying on my training data up to my last update. Historically, SV Darmstadt 98 operates in higher...
Darmstadt 98, playing in a higher division, is expected to have a stronger squad than FC Carl Zeiss Jena. While Jena has a decent home recor...
Carl Zeiss Jena are at home with a solid recent record (3-0-2 in last five) and an extra rest day. Darmstadt have been inconsistent on the r...
Draw no bet
ConsensusSV Darmstadt 98 3/4
Darmstadt expected to avoid defeat against lower-league opposition. Rest days are similar so no major fatigue edge. Training data through 20...
Based on historical context and general team strength differences, SV Darmstadt 98 is the stronger side. The draw no bet market provides sec...
Given Darmstadt's superior league standing and perceived squad depth, they are the more likely winners. The draw no bet market mitigates the...
Without the draw outcome, the home side still holds a slight edge based on form and venue. Darmstadt have quality but have shown inconsisten...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Cup matches between mismatched sides often open up after the first goal. Both teams show decent recent scoring rates in provided form. Train...
While specific 2026 form is unavailable, the provided hypothetical form suggests Darmstadt has a strong attack (scored 13 in 5 matches). Aga...
Both teams have shown a tendency to score in recent matches, and cup games often see more attacking play. While Jena's defense has been soli...
Both teams have shown scoring ability (Jena 8 goals in 5, Darmstadt 13 in 5) and their defenses are not particularly strong (Jena conceding...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Jena likely to score at home while Darmstadt attack should find chances. Set-piece threat noted in both squads. Training data through 2025-0...
Darmstadt's provided form indicates they conceded 6 goals in 5 matches, suggesting their defense isn't impenetrable. FC Carl Zeiss Jena, pla...
Jena has a decent scoring record at home, and Darmstadt, despite being the favorite, is likely to concede at least one goal, especially in a...
Both teams have been scoring regularly, and each has shown defensive vulnerabilities. Darmstadt's away matches tend to see goals at both end...
Spread
ConsensusSV Darmstadt 98 3/4
Darmstadt quality suggests they cover the spread despite venue. Limited recent H2H data available. Training data through 2025-09.
Given Darmstadt's superior historical league standing and strong attacking form (13 goals in 5 matches) against a lower-tier opponent, they...
FC Carl Zeiss Jena is playing at home, but Darmstadt 98 is the stronger team. While a -1 handicap is significant, Darmstadt's attacking pres...
Away -1 requires Darmstadt to win by at least two goals, which is a tall order given their inconsistent form. Jena are unlikely to be blown...
Asian handicap
ConsensusSV Darmstadt 98 1/4
Asian line likely favors the professional side. Home side may struggle to break down organized defense. Training data through 2025-09.
This market is similar to the spreads, requiring Darmstadt to win by at least two goals for a full win. Given their historical advantage in...
This is equivalent to the draw no bet market. Given Darmstadt's stronger pedigree and form, they are favored to get at least a draw, if not...
With the +0.5 handicap, Jena only need a draw to cover, which aligns with the expectation of a tight contest. Darmstadt's away form is not d...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusDraw / SV Darmstadt 98 2/4
Jena may hold early but Darmstadt quality expected to tell later. Similar rest favors controlled approach. Training data through 2025-09.
Darmstadt, as the superior team, is expected to establish dominance early in the match and maintain it throughout. While cup upsets or a slo...
Darmstadt is expected to win, but Jena is capable of putting up a fight, especially at home. It's plausible that the first half ends in a dr...
Given the tight nature of the match, a draw at half-time is plausible. Jena might forge ahead in the second half with home support, making d...
Correct score
Consensus1-2 2/4
Low-scoring away win most probable outcome given level difference. Set pieces could decide narrow result. Training data through 2025-09.
Considering Darmstadt's superior quality and attacking form, they are likely to score multiple goals. Jena's home advantage and recent scori...
Considering Darmstadt's slight advantage and the expectation of both teams scoring, a close game is likely. A 1-2 scoreline reflects Darmsta...
A 1-1 draw is a common scoreline in evenly matched cup ties, considering both teams' scoring and defensive records. Other probable scores in...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
SV Darmstadt 98
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
SV Darmstadt 98
Grok 4 Fast
SV Darmstadt 98
DeepSeek V3
FC Carl Zeiss Jena
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
8656810183092add…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 13:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30108,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Ernst Abbe Sportfeld",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T13:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 13:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "SV Darmstadt 98",
"home": "FC Carl Zeiss Jena"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LDDWW",
"record": "2W-2D-1L",
"scored": 13,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WLWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 4
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 7,
"home": 8
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.