Esha VelagavsEkaterina Ovcharenko
EOYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 21.5 3/10 models |
Esha Velaga 3/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Over 2.5 |
58%
Esha Velaga |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 Women's tennis matches at WTA 250 level (Philly Open) typically go to three sets when both players are relatively evenly matched. Given the...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Esha Velaga Esha Velaga is predicted to win based on training knowledge through early 2025, though limited public data is available for both players in... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
under_2.5 |
58%
Esha Velaga |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Best-of-3 format in early-round ITF-level events often ends in straight sets when one player holds a modest edge. Limited player profiles su...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Esha Velaga No prior match data exists between Esha Velaga and Ekaterina Ovcharenko. Both players appear to be low-ranked juniors with minimal professio... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 |
55%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 As both Esha Velaga and Ekaterina Ovcharenko compete at similar levels on the ITF tour, their matches are often competitive and prone to goi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko Based on my training data up to its last update, Ekaterina Ovcharenko has historically shown a slightly more consistent record on hard court... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
52%
over |
55%
Esha Velaga |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over The match is projected to be close, with a slight advantage to Esha Velaga. This suggests a contest that could go the distance, making an 'o...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Esha Velaga Based on general knowledge up to my last training data, Esha Velaga is a more established player with a stronger overall record, giving her... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
70%
Over 1.5 |
65%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 In women's ITF matches, best-of-three sets are standard, and a competitive match is likely given that both players are relatively unknown at...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Ekaterina Ovcharenko Based on training data up to early 2025, Ovcharenko has consistently higher ITF rankings and more experience on hard courts, which is the ty... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 3/10
Women's tennis matches at WTA 250 level (Philly Open) typically go to three sets when both players are relatively evenly matched. Given the...
Best-of-3 format in early-round ITF-level events often ends in straight sets when one player holds a modest edge. Limited player profiles su...
As both Esha Velaga and Ekaterina Ovcharenko compete at similar levels on the ITF tour, their matches are often competitive and prone to goi...
The match is projected to be close, with a slight advantage to Esha Velaga. This suggests a contest that could go the distance, making an 'o...
In women's ITF matches, best-of-three sets are standard, and a competitive match is likely given that both players are relatively unknown at...
Match winner
ConsensusEsha Velaga 3/5
Esha Velaga is predicted to win based on training knowledge through early 2025, though limited public data is available for both players in...
No prior match data exists between Esha Velaga and Ekaterina Ovcharenko. Both players appear to be low-ranked juniors with minimal professio...
Based on my training data up to its last update, Ekaterina Ovcharenko has historically shown a slightly more consistent record on hard court...
Based on general knowledge up to my last training data, Esha Velaga is a more established player with a stronger overall record, giving her...
Based on training data up to early 2025, Ovcharenko has consistently higher ITF rankings and more experience on hard courts, which is the ty...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerDeepSeek V3
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Claude Haiku 4.5
Esha Velaga
Grok 4 Fast
Esha Velaga
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Esha Velaga
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
cff09964e38d214e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 14:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30545,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ennoble Care Philly Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T14:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 14:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ekaterina Ovcharenko",
"home": "Esha Velaga"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.