Energie CottbusvsFC Augsburg
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
FC Augsburg 3/4 models |
FC Augsburg 4/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
no 2/4 models |
FC Augsburg 2/4 models |
FC Augsburg -1.5 2/4 models |
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg 3/4 models |
1-3 1/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
68%
FC Augsburg |
76%
FC Augsburg |
62%
over |
59%
no |
64%
FC Augsburg |
55%
FC Augsburg -1.5 |
51%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg |
22%
1-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
FC Augsburg Augsburg is a Bundesliga side facing a regional-league Cottbus in the DFB Pokal; historical results show top-flight teams dominate these tie...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
76%
FC Augsburg Draws are rare when Bundesliga sides visit lower leagues in cup ties. Augsburg's attacking options and experience outweigh Cottbus home adva...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over Cup mismatches typically produce open games with the favorite pushing for multiple goals. Cottbus defensive record of 13 conceded in 5 sugge...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
59%
no Augsburg defensive organization usually keeps clean sheets against much weaker opposition. Cottbus attack scored only 9 in their last 5 and...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
64%
FC Augsburg Augsburg expected to win by more than one goal given the level difference. Cottbus home form of 3 losses in 5 offers little resistance. Trai...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
FC Augsburg -1.5 Augsburg should cover a 1.5-goal handicap in most scenarios against lower-league opposition. Defensive leaks at Cottbus increase likelihood...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
51%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg Augsburg expected to control the game from the first half onward. Cottbus unlikely to mount a sustained comeback. Training data on cup misma...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
1-3 Expected scoreline reflects Augsburg dominance while allowing for one Cottbus goal from set pieces. Multiple clean-sheet scenarios exist but... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
82%
FC Augsburg |
88%
FC Augsburg |
70%
Over 2.5 |
65%
No |
75%
FC Augsburg -1 |
68%
FC Augsburg -1.5 |
68%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg |
12%
0-3 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
FC Augsburg Based on my training data, FC Augsburg is a Bundesliga team while Energie Cottbus typically competes in lower divisions. This significant di...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
88%
FC Augsburg Considering FC Augsburg's superior quality as a Bundesliga side, they are highly expected to win this cup tie against a lower-league opponen...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 2.5 FC Augsburg, as the stronger Bundesliga team, is likely to score multiple goals against Energie Cottbus, who are from a lower division. Thei...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
No FC Augsburg's defense, accustomed to Bundesliga competition, should be robust enough to keep a clean sheet against Energie Cottbus from a lo...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
FC Augsburg -1 Given the considerable gap in quality between a Bundesliga team and a lower-division side, FC Augsburg is expected to secure a victory by at...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
68%
FC Augsburg -1.5 Building on the significant league disparity, FC Augsburg is expected to win by at least two clear goals against Energie Cottbus. A -1.5 Asi...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
68%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg FC Augsburg is expected to assert their dominance early in the match, reflecting their superior league standing and quality. They are highly...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
0-3 A 0-3 scoreline is a strong candidate, reflecting FC Augsburg's offensive power and ability to keep a clean sheet against a lower-league opp... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
FC Augsburg |
65%
FC Augsburg |
55%
over |
55%
no |
55%
FC Augsburg |
55%
away_ -1.0 |
50%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg |
15%
0-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
FC Augsburg FC Augsburg plays in the Bundesliga and is a significantly stronger team than FC Energie Cottbus, who are in the 3. Liga. Historical data an...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
FC Augsburg Augsburg's superior league status and likely higher quality squad make them strong favorites. Even if Cottbus can secure a draw at home, Aug...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over While Augsburg is the stronger team, cup matches can sometimes be tighter. However, Augsburg's attacking talent and potential for a dominant...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no FC Augsburg is expected to be defensively solid against a team from a lower division. While Cottbus might score if they are particularly ins...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
FC Augsburg FC Augsburg is favored to win by more than one goal. Their superior attacking firepower and the potential for a dominant performance against...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ -1.0 Given Augsburg's status as a Bundesliga side against a 3. Liga opponent in the DFB Pokal, they are expected to win by at least one goal. The...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
50%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg FC Augsburg is expected to be the stronger team and lead at halftime, and then maintain their advantage to win the match. Their superior qua...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-2 FC Augsburg is expected to win, likely by more than one goal, but without completely dominating. A 2-0 or 1-2 scoreline seems plausible, ref...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
35%
Energie Cottbus |
52%
FC Augsburg |
52%
over |
55%
yes |
28%
away_ -1 |
55%
home_ +0.25 |
25%
away_away |
12%
1-2 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
35%
Energie Cottbus Training data through 2025-09 indicates Energie Cottbus are a lower-tier side with home advantage in a cup tie, but FC Augsburg, despite rec...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
52%
FC Augsburg With the draw removed, Augsburg's superior class gives them the edge, but Cottbus's home advantage and potential cup fight could make it clo...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have leaky defenses (Cottbus conceded 13, Augsburg 12 in last 5), and cup ties between different divisions often see goals. Augsb...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Cottbus have scored in most games at home, and Augsburg's defense has looked shaky, conceding 12 in their last five. Augsburg's attack is po...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
28%
away_ -1 Augsburg as the stronger team might win, but covering a -1 handicap requires winning by 2+ goals, which is unlikely given Cottbus's home res...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ +0.25 Given the potential for a close cup tie, backing the underdog with a +0.25 handicap protects against a one-goal loss while gaining if they d...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
away_away With Augsburg's superior quality, they are likely to lead at half-time and maintain or extend the lead. However, cup games can be tight earl...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
1-2 The most likely scoreline sees Augsburg winning by a single goal, with Cottbus scoring as they push for an equalizer. A 1-2 away win aligns... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusFC Augsburg 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
68%
FC Augsburg
Augsburg is a Bundesliga side facing a regional-league Cottbus in the DFB Pokal; historical results show top-flight teams dominate these tie...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
82%
FC Augsburg
Based on my training data, FC Augsburg is a Bundesliga team while Energie Cottbus typically competes in lower divisions. This significant di...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
FC Augsburg
FC Augsburg plays in the Bundesliga and is a significantly stronger team than FC Energie Cottbus, who are in the 3. Liga. Historical data an...
DeepSeek V3
35%
Energie Cottbus
Training data through 2025-09 indicates Energie Cottbus are a lower-tier side with home advantage in a cup tie, but FC Augsburg, despite rec...
Draw no bet
ConsensusFC Augsburg 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
76%
FC Augsburg
Draws are rare when Bundesliga sides visit lower leagues in cup ties. Augsburg's attacking options and experience outweigh Cottbus home adva...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
88%
FC Augsburg
Considering FC Augsburg's superior quality as a Bundesliga side, they are highly expected to win this cup tie against a lower-league opponen...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
65%
FC Augsburg
Augsburg's superior league status and likely higher quality squad make them strong favorites. Even if Cottbus can secure a draw at home, Aug...
DeepSeek V3
52%
FC Augsburg
With the draw removed, Augsburg's superior class gives them the edge, but Cottbus's home advantage and potential cup fight could make it clo...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
62%
over
Cup mismatches typically produce open games with the favorite pushing for multiple goals. Cottbus defensive record of 13 conceded in 5 sugge...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
70%
Over 2.5
FC Augsburg, as the stronger Bundesliga team, is likely to score multiple goals against Energie Cottbus, who are from a lower division. Thei...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
over
While Augsburg is the stronger team, cup matches can sometimes be tighter. However, Augsburg's attacking talent and potential for a dominant...
DeepSeek V3
52%
over
Both teams have leaky defenses (Cottbus conceded 13, Augsburg 12 in last 5), and cup ties between different divisions often see goals. Augsb...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
59%
no
Augsburg defensive organization usually keeps clean sheets against much weaker opposition. Cottbus attack scored only 9 in their last 5 and...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
No
FC Augsburg's defense, accustomed to Bundesliga competition, should be robust enough to keep a clean sheet against Energie Cottbus from a lo...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
no
FC Augsburg is expected to be defensively solid against a team from a lower division. While Cottbus might score if they are particularly ins...
DeepSeek V3
55%
yes
Cottbus have scored in most games at home, and Augsburg's defense has looked shaky, conceding 12 in their last five. Augsburg's attack is po...
Spread
ConsensusFC Augsburg 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
64%
FC Augsburg
Augsburg expected to win by more than one goal given the level difference. Cottbus home form of 3 losses in 5 offers little resistance. Trai...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
75%
FC Augsburg -1
Given the considerable gap in quality between a Bundesliga team and a lower-division side, FC Augsburg is expected to secure a victory by at...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
FC Augsburg
FC Augsburg is favored to win by more than one goal. Their superior attacking firepower and the potential for a dominant performance against...
DeepSeek V3
28%
away_ -1
Augsburg as the stronger team might win, but covering a -1 handicap requires winning by 2+ goals, which is unlikely given Cottbus's home res...
Asian handicap
ConsensusFC Augsburg -1.5 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
FC Augsburg -1.5
Augsburg should cover a 1.5-goal handicap in most scenarios against lower-league opposition. Defensive leaks at Cottbus increase likelihood...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68%
FC Augsburg -1.5
Building on the significant league disparity, FC Augsburg is expected to win by at least two clear goals against Energie Cottbus. A -1.5 Asi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
away_ -1.0
Given Augsburg's status as a Bundesliga side against a 3. Liga opponent in the DFB Pokal, they are expected to win by at least one goal. The...
DeepSeek V3
55%
home_ +0.25
Given the potential for a close cup tie, backing the underdog with a +0.25 handicap protects against a one-goal loss while gaining if they d...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusFC Augsburg / FC Augsburg 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg
Augsburg expected to control the game from the first half onward. Cottbus unlikely to mount a sustained comeback. Training data on cup misma...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg
FC Augsburg is expected to assert their dominance early in the match, reflecting their superior league standing and quality. They are highly...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
50%
FC Augsburg / FC Augsburg
FC Augsburg is expected to be the stronger team and lead at halftime, and then maintain their advantage to win the match. Their superior qua...
DeepSeek V3
25%
away_away
With Augsburg's superior quality, they are likely to lead at half-time and maintain or extend the lead. However, cup games can be tight earl...
Correct score
Consensus1-3 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
22%
1-3
Expected scoreline reflects Augsburg dominance while allowing for one Cottbus goal from set pieces. Multiple clean-sheet scenarios exist but...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
12%
0-3
A 0-3 scoreline is a strong candidate, reflecting FC Augsburg's offensive power and ability to keep a clean sheet against a lower-league opp...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
0-2
FC Augsburg is expected to win, likely by more than one goal, but without completely dominating. A 2-0 or 1-2 scoreline seems plausible, ref...
DeepSeek V3
12%
1-2
The most likely scoreline sees Augsburg winning by a single goal, with Cottbus scoring as they push for an equalizer. A 1-2 away win aligns...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
FC Augsburg
Grok 4 Fast
FC Augsburg
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
FC Augsburg
DeepSeek V3
Energie Cottbus
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a6fbb01a1f372605…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 11:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 28634,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "LEAG Energie Stadion",
"league": "DFB Pokal",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T11:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 11:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "FC Augsburg",
"home": "Energie Cottbus"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWLD",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 21,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 12
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 9,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 13
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6,
"home": 5
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.