En-Shuo LiangvsAnna Bondar
ABYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Anna Bondar 4/5 models |
under 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Anna Bondar |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Anna Bondar Anna Bondar is the higher-ranked player (typically WTA top 100) with more consistent hard-court performance and stronger serve patterns. En-...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 Both players are solid technical competitors on hard court. While Bondar enters as the favorite, Liang's youth and potential for upset patch... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Anna Bondar |
65%
under |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Anna Bondar Anna Bondar holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts compared to En-Shuo Liang based on pre-2025 form. Head-to-head...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under Bondar is expected to dominate and close in straight sets on this surface. Best-of-3 format makes under 2.5 sets the likely outcome. Trainin... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
68%
Anna Bondar |
60%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Anna Bondar Based on my training data up to my last update, Anna Bondar generally holds a higher ranking and has more experience at the WTA main draw le...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under_2.5 Given Anna Bondar is the favored player based on general form and head-to-head history on hard courts, a straight-sets victory is the most p... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Anna Bondar |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Anna Bondar Anna Bondar is a more experienced and higher-ranked player on the WTA tour, with a history of stronger performances against players of En-Sh...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 Given Bondar's likely advantage, a two-set victory is probable, but Liang has shown the ability to take a set off stronger opponents on occa... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
En-Shuo Liang |
51%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
En-Shuo Liang Based on training data through early 2025, En-Shuo Liang has shown solid form on hard courts, while Anna Bondar has struggled with consisten...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over_2.5 Both players have shown competitive matches against similar opposition, often going to three sets. Liang's slight edge may not be enough to... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusAnna Bondar 4/5
Anna Bondar is the higher-ranked player (typically WTA top 100) with more consistent hard-court performance and stronger serve patterns. En-...
Anna Bondar holds a higher ranking and stronger recent results on hard courts compared to En-Shuo Liang based on pre-2025 form. Head-to-head...
Based on my training data up to my last update, Anna Bondar generally holds a higher ranking and has more experience at the WTA main draw le...
Anna Bondar is a more experienced and higher-ranked player on the WTA tour, with a history of stronger performances against players of En-Sh...
Based on training data through early 2025, En-Shuo Liang has shown solid form on hard courts, while Anna Bondar has struggled with consisten...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/10
Both players are solid technical competitors on hard court. While Bondar enters as the favorite, Liang's youth and potential for upset patch...
Bondar is expected to dominate and close in straight sets on this surface. Best-of-3 format makes under 2.5 sets the likely outcome. Trainin...
Given Anna Bondar is the favored player based on general form and head-to-head history on hard courts, a straight-sets victory is the most p...
Given Bondar's likely advantage, a two-set victory is probable, but Liang has shown the ability to take a set off stronger opponents on occa...
Both players have shown competitive matches against similar opposition, often going to three sets. Liang's slight edge may not be enough to...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Anna Bondar
Grok 4 Fast
Anna Bondar
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Anna Bondar
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anna Bondar
DeepSeek V3
En-Shuo Liang
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
569fdd64c6aa248e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 23 · 22:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30567,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-23T22:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 23 Aug 2026 22:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Anna Bondar",
"home": "En-Shuo Liang"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.