Emiliana ArangovsPanna Udvardy
PUYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 21.5 2/10 models |
Emiliana Arango 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Emiliana Arango |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Women's professional tennis at 250-level tournaments (Abierto GNP Seguros fits this tier) typically features competitive first sets and clos...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Emiliana Arango Emiliana Arango is a Colombian player competing in her home region (Abierto GNP Seguros is held in Mexico, a familiar Latin American circuit... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
over 21.5 |
62%
Emiliana Arango |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 21.5 Serve-heavy styles on this surface typically push total games above 21.5 even in straight-set wins. Break-point conversion rates for both ar...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Emiliana Arango Emiliana Arango holds the surface edge on hard courts and better recent results against mid-tier opponents in training data through 2024. Pa... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Under 2.5 Sets |
65%
Emiliana Arango |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Arango's comfort on hard courts and Udvardy's relative struggles on this surface based on historical performance, a straight-sets vict...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Emiliana Arango Based on training data through early 2024, Emiliana Arango generally performs better on hard courts, which is the likely surface for the Abi... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
62%
2.5 |
58%
Emiliana Arango |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
2.5 Given the close H2H prediction and their relatively similar performances, this match is likely to go to three sets. Both players have the ab...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Emiliana Arango Emiliana Arango has a slightly higher recent form and a slightly better hard court record compared to Panna Udvardy. While their rankings ar...
3 sources cited
|
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
85%
Over 1.5 |
55%
Emiliana Arango |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
85%
Over 1.5 Both players are evenly matched and have similar skill levels, making a straight-sets win less likely. Recent meetings have gone to three se...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Emiliana Arango Training data through 2025-09. Arango has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with solid serving and aggressive baseline play. Udvard... |
|||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 21.5 2/10
Women's professional tennis at 250-level tournaments (Abierto GNP Seguros fits this tier) typically features competitive first sets and clos...
Serve-heavy styles on this surface typically push total games above 21.5 even in straight-set wins. Break-point conversion rates for both ar...
Given Arango's comfort on hard courts and Udvardy's relative struggles on this surface based on historical performance, a straight-sets vict...
Given the close H2H prediction and their relatively similar performances, this match is likely to go to three sets. Both players have the ab...
Both players are evenly matched and have similar skill levels, making a straight-sets win less likely. Recent meetings have gone to three se...
Match winner
ConsensusEmiliana Arango 5/5
Emiliana Arango is a Colombian player competing in her home region (Abierto GNP Seguros is held in Mexico, a familiar Latin American circuit...
Emiliana Arango holds the surface edge on hard courts and better recent results against mid-tier opponents in training data through 2024. Pa...
Based on training data through early 2024, Emiliana Arango generally performs better on hard courts, which is the likely surface for the Abi...
Emiliana Arango has a slightly higher recent form and a slightly better hard court record compared to Panna Udvardy. While their rankings ar...
Training data through 2025-09. Arango has shown stronger recent form on hard courts, with solid serving and aggressive baseline play. Udvard...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Emiliana Arango
Claude Haiku 4.5
Emiliana Arango
Grok 4 Fast
Emiliana Arango
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Emiliana Arango
DeepSeek V3
Emiliana Arango
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a6033c85d6b06c53…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 22 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 29771,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-22T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 22 Aug 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Panna Udvardy",
"home": "Emiliana Arango"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.