Elsa JacquemotvsKayla Day
KDYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elsa Jacquemot 3/5 models |
under_2.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Kayla Day |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Kayla Day Kayla Day holds a slight edge in recent WTA form and typically performs better on hard courts, which is the Kia Open surface. Elsa Jacquemot...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 In best-of-three matches between players of similar ranking and experience, competitive sets are the norm. Both Jacquemot and Day are capabl... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Elsa Jacquemot |
62%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Elsa Jacquemot Elsa Jacquemot holds a slight edge on form from training data through late 2025 and is expected to handle the hard-court conditions better t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under_2.5 Both players show solid serve stats in prior hard-court matches, favoring straight-sets outcomes. Limited fatigue indicators point to a quic... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Kayla Day |
60%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Kayla Day Based on my training data up to its last update, Kayla Day generally demonstrates a slight edge on hard courts due to her aggressive style a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Both players are competitive and capable of taking a set from each other, leading to a higher probability of a three-set encounter. Their sk... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Elsa Jacquemot |
55%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elsa Jacquemot Based on training data, Elsa Jacquemot has shown a slightly stronger performance profile on hard courts compared to Kayla Day. While both pl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given that both players are relatively evenly matched on hard courts, this match is likely to be closely contested. A three-set match is pla... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Elsa Jacquemot |
60%
under_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Elsa Jacquemot This is an early-stage clay-court tournament (Kia Open) in September 2026, and based on training data through 2025-09, both players are even...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under_2.5 Despite the competitive evenly matched nature of this pairing, the fatigue factor from early tournament rounds and the mental pressure of a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElsa Jacquemot 3/5
Kayla Day holds a slight edge in recent WTA form and typically performs better on hard courts, which is the Kia Open surface. Elsa Jacquemot...
Elsa Jacquemot holds a slight edge on form from training data through late 2025 and is expected to handle the hard-court conditions better t...
Based on my training data up to its last update, Kayla Day generally demonstrates a slight edge on hard courts due to her aggressive style a...
Based on training data, Elsa Jacquemot has shown a slightly stronger performance profile on hard courts compared to Kayla Day. While both pl...
This is an early-stage clay-court tournament (Kia Open) in September 2026, and based on training data through 2025-09, both players are even...
Over / Under
Consensusunder_2.5 2/10
In best-of-three matches between players of similar ranking and experience, competitive sets are the norm. Both Jacquemot and Day are capabl...
Both players show solid serve stats in prior hard-court matches, favoring straight-sets outcomes. Limited fatigue indicators point to a quic...
Both players are competitive and capable of taking a set from each other, leading to a higher probability of a three-set encounter. Their sk...
Given that both players are relatively evenly matched on hard courts, this match is likely to be closely contested. A three-set match is pla...
Despite the competitive evenly matched nature of this pairing, the fatigue factor from early tournament rounds and the mental pressure of a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Kayla Day
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elsa Jacquemot
Grok 4 Fast
Elsa Jacquemot
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Kayla Day
DeepSeek V3
Elsa Jacquemot
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
69f3840742ebbf5a…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 20:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39788,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T20:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 20:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Kayla Day",
"home": "Elsa Jacquemot"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.