Elsa JacquemotvsEmanuela Lares
ELAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 2/10 models |
Elsa Jacquemot 5/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5 |
62%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 Women's tennis at secondary tournaments like the Kia Open typically sees competitive sets; a straight-sets win (2–0) is common but three-set...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Elsa Jacquemot Elsa Jacquemot is seeded higher and has more consistent WTA-level experience than Lares, a lower-ranked challenger. Without access to curren... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
65%
under_2.5 |
78%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under_2.5 Jacquemot favored to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-3 format on outdoor hard courts often ends quickly when one player d...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Elsa Jacquemot Elsa Jacquemot holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Emanuela Lares based on pre-2024 WTA data. Jacquemot's stronger serve and move... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
75%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Based on the assumption that Elsa Jacquemot is the stronger player from my training data, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outco...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Elsa Jacquemot This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future. Elsa Jacquemot is a known professional pla... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over |
65%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The prediction for a competitive match with over 2.5 sets naturally extends to an expectation of a higher number of games. Both players have...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Elsa Jacquemot Based on my training data, Elsa Jacquemot is generally the stronger player in head-to-head matchups and has a more consistent record on hard... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Under 2.5 |
60%
Elsa Jacquemot |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 Given the expected gap in skill level between Jacquemot and Lares, Jacquemot is likely to win in straight sets (2-0) rather than going to th...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elsa Jacquemot Based on training data through 2025-09, Elsa Jacquemot has consistently higher WTA rankings and more experience on hard courts, which favors... |
|||
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/10
Women's tennis at secondary tournaments like the Kia Open typically sees competitive sets; a straight-sets win (2–0) is common but three-set...
Jacquemot favored to win in straight sets given the talent gap. Best-of-3 format on outdoor hard courts often ends quickly when one player d...
Based on the assumption that Elsa Jacquemot is the stronger player from my training data, a straight-sets victory is the most probable outco...
The prediction for a competitive match with over 2.5 sets naturally extends to an expectation of a higher number of games. Both players have...
Given the expected gap in skill level between Jacquemot and Lares, Jacquemot is likely to win in straight sets (2-0) rather than going to th...
Match winner
ConsensusElsa Jacquemot 5/5
Elsa Jacquemot is seeded higher and has more consistent WTA-level experience than Lares, a lower-ranked challenger. Without access to curren...
Elsa Jacquemot holds a clear ranking and experience edge over Emanuela Lares based on pre-2024 WTA data. Jacquemot's stronger serve and move...
This prediction is based on my training data up to my last update, as the event is in the future. Elsa Jacquemot is a known professional pla...
Based on my training data, Elsa Jacquemot is generally the stronger player in head-to-head matchups and has a more consistent record on hard...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Elsa Jacquemot has consistently higher WTA rankings and more experience on hard courts, which favors...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Elsa Jacquemot
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elsa Jacquemot
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elsa Jacquemot
Claude Haiku 4.5
Elsa Jacquemot
DeepSeek V3
Elsa Jacquemot
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
08b0f52c1353f353…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Sep 8 · 21:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39444,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Kia Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-08T20:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 08 Sep 2026 20:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Emanuela Lares",
"home": "Elsa Jacquemot"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.