Elmer MollervsChak Lam Coleman Wong
CLYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elmer Moller 3/5 models |
under 3.5 1/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
52%
Over 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Both players are lower-ranked fringe professionals unlikely to hold recent public profiles in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). The US Open...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 2.5 At the US Open, fringe professionals in early or mid-round matches often produce competitive sets rather than blowouts, particularly on hard... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Elmer Moller |
62%
under 3.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Elmer Moller Elmer Moller holds a slight edge on hard courts based on prior junior and challenger results against similar opponents. Coleman Wong has sho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under 3.5 Early-round US Open matches between lower-ranked players often finish in straight or four sets due to serve dominance on hard courts. Limite... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Elmer Moller |
60%
Over 3.5 sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Elmer Moller Based on general career trajectory and performance on hard courts from available training data (prior to 2023), Elmer Moller often demonstra...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 3.5 sets Both players appear relatively evenly matched based on their historical performance and skill profiles on hard courts according to my traini... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Elmer Moller |
65%
2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elmer Moller Based on training data, Elmer Moller has shown a higher overall trajectory and consistency in recent years compared to Chak Lam Coleman Wong...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.5 This match is expected to be competitive, with both players having the potential to win sets. Moller's slightly better form and Wong's abili... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
55%
under_4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Training data through 2025-09: Wong has shown more consistent results on hard courts, with a higher ceiling in terms of serve and baseline a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under_4.5 Both players have relatively consistent serving patterns and this is a first-round match where nerves can lead to breaks, but neither is a d... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElmer Moller 3/5
Both players are lower-ranked fringe professionals unlikely to hold recent public profiles in my training data (cutoff 2025-09). The US Open...
Elmer Moller holds a slight edge on hard courts based on prior junior and challenger results against similar opponents. Coleman Wong has sho...
Based on general career trajectory and performance on hard courts from available training data (prior to 2023), Elmer Moller often demonstra...
Based on training data, Elmer Moller has shown a higher overall trajectory and consistency in recent years compared to Chak Lam Coleman Wong...
Training data through 2025-09: Wong has shown more consistent results on hard courts, with a higher ceiling in terms of serve and baseline a...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3.5 1/10
At the US Open, fringe professionals in early or mid-round matches often produce competitive sets rather than blowouts, particularly on hard...
Early-round US Open matches between lower-ranked players often finish in straight or four sets due to serve dominance on hard courts. Limite...
Both players appear relatively evenly matched based on their historical performance and skill profiles on hard courts according to my traini...
This match is expected to be competitive, with both players having the potential to win sets. Moller's slightly better form and Wong's abili...
Both players have relatively consistent serving patterns and this is a first-round match where nerves can lead to breaks, but neither is a d...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elmer Moller
Claude Haiku 4.5
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Grok 4 Fast
Elmer Moller
DeepSeek V3
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elmer Moller
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
0fa3787db5ed19b7…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 24 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 30724,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "US Open",
"starts_at": "2026-08-24T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chak Lam Coleman Wong",
"home": "Elmer Moller"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.