Elizara YanevavsZhibek Kulambayeva
ZKYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elizara Yaneva 4/5 models |
Over 1.5 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Elizara Yaneva |
58%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Elizara Yaneva Elizara Yaneva is the higher-ranked player (Bulgarian, more established WTA/ITF circuit presence) and typically carries advantage in a quali...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 1.5 At the ATIK Antalya Open (a hard-court tournament typically featuring competitive lower-ranked players), matches rarely end in straight sets... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Elizara Yaneva |
58%
over_2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Elizara Yaneva Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles in training data through 2025-09. Home player Elizara Yaneva benefi...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over_2.5 Best-of-3 format on outdoor surface favors three-set matches between evenly matched lower-tier players. Serve and return inconsistencies typ... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Elizara Yaneva |
60%
over_21.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Elizara Yaneva This prediction relies solely on my training data up to its last update, as detailed information for a match in 2026 is unavailable. Assumin...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over_21.5 Given the prediction for a three-set match, the total games are expected to exceed a standard line of 21.5. Even a tight two-set match (e.g.... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Elizara Yaneva |
70%
Zhibek Kulambayeva |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Elizara Yaneva Based on general knowledge up to my last training data, Elizara Yaneva has shown a stronger overall performance and consistency compared to...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Zhibek Kulambayeva Given the slight edge in favor of Elizara Yaneva, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. Both players are likely to compete, but Ya... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
Zhibek Kulambayeva |
70%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Zhibek Kulambayeva Based on training data through early 2025, Kulambayeva holds a higher ITF ranking and more experience on clay, which is typical for Antalya...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Over 1.5 In ITF clay events, competitive matches often extend to three sets, especially when the favorite is not top-100. Kulambayeva's consistency a... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElizara Yaneva 4/5
Elizara Yaneva is the higher-ranked player (Bulgarian, more established WTA/ITF circuit presence) and typically carries advantage in a quali...
Both players are low-ranked ITF competitors with limited public profiles in training data through 2025-09. Home player Elizara Yaneva benefi...
This prediction relies solely on my training data up to its last update, as detailed information for a match in 2026 is unavailable. Assumin...
Based on general knowledge up to my last training data, Elizara Yaneva has shown a stronger overall performance and consistency compared to...
Based on training data through early 2025, Kulambayeva holds a higher ITF ranking and more experience on clay, which is typical for Antalya...
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 1.5 2/10
At the ATIK Antalya Open (a hard-court tournament typically featuring competitive lower-ranked players), matches rarely end in straight sets...
Best-of-3 format on outdoor surface favors three-set matches between evenly matched lower-tier players. Serve and return inconsistencies typ...
Given the prediction for a three-set match, the total games are expected to exceed a standard line of 21.5. Even a tight two-set match (e.g....
Given the slight edge in favor of Elizara Yaneva, a two-set victory is the most probable outcome. Both players are likely to compete, but Ya...
In ITF clay events, competitive matches often extend to three sets, especially when the favorite is not top-100. Kulambayeva's consistency a...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Elizara Yaneva
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elizara Yaneva
DeepSeek V3
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elizara Yaneva
Grok 4 Fast
Elizara Yaneva
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
955cae06b1996dca…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Sep 9 · 09:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39441,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "ATIK Antalya Open",
"starts_at": "2026-09-09T04:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 09 Sep 2026 04:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Zhibek Kulambayeva",
"home": "Elizara Yaneva"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.