Elise MertensvsNikola Bartunkova
NBAI predictions
2 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 2 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Elise Mertens 5/5 models |
Under 2.5 Sets 2/10 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Elise Mertens |
62%
Over 1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Elise Mertens Elise Mertens is an established WTA player with extensive hard-court experience and a proven record in tournaments like the Abierto GNP Segu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 1.5 While Mertens is favoured, Bartunkova is unlikely to be completely outmatched in a WTA 500 event. Hard courts often produce competitive sets... |
|||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Elise Mertens |
71%
under 2.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Elise Mertens Elise Mertens is a top-30 WTA veteran with strong hard-court results while Nikola Bartunkova remains a lower-ranked junior-level player with...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
71%
under 2.5 Mertens dominates lower-tier opposition and rarely drops sets on hard courts. Bartunkova lacks the experience to force a deciding set agains... |
|||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 2 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Elise Mertens |
60%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Elise Mertens Elise Mertens, based on her established career and higher ranking in my training data, holds a significant experience and skill advantage ov...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Sets Given Mertens's expected dominance and experience, she is likely to win in straight sets, leading to an 'Under 2.5 Sets' outcome. While Bart... |
|||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
70%
Elise Mertens |
65%
2.0 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Elise Mertens Elise Mertens is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more titles...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
2.0 Given Elise Mertens's superior experience and consistent performance, it's highly probable she will win this match in straight sets. Nikola... |
|||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
75%
Elise Mertens |
65%
Under 2.5 Sets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Elise Mertens Elise Mertens is a top-30 player with extensive WTA experience and a strong baseline game, while Bartunkova is a young qualifier with limite...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Sets Mertens is likely to win in straight sets given her experience and the gap in ranking. Bartunkova may be competitive but lacks the firepower... |
|||
Match winner
ConsensusElise Mertens 5/5
Elise Mertens is an established WTA player with extensive hard-court experience and a proven record in tournaments like the Abierto GNP Segu...
Elise Mertens is a top-30 WTA veteran with strong hard-court results while Nikola Bartunkova remains a lower-ranked junior-level player with...
Elise Mertens, based on her established career and higher ranking in my training data, holds a significant experience and skill advantage ov...
Elise Mertens is a significantly more experienced and accomplished player on the WTA tour, with a higher career-high ranking and more titles...
Elise Mertens is a top-30 player with extensive WTA experience and a strong baseline game, while Bartunkova is a young qualifier with limite...
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 2.5 Sets 2/10
While Mertens is favoured, Bartunkova is unlikely to be completely outmatched in a WTA 500 event. Hard courts often produce competitive sets...
Mertens dominates lower-tier opposition and rarely drops sets on hard courts. Bartunkova lacks the experience to force a deciding set agains...
Given Mertens's expected dominance and experience, she is likely to win in straight sets, leading to an 'Under 2.5 Sets' outcome. While Bart...
Given Elise Mertens's superior experience and consistent performance, it's highly probable she will win this match in straight sets. Nikola...
Mertens is likely to win in straight sets given her experience and the gap in ranking. Bartunkova may be competitive but lacks the firepower...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Elise Mertens
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Elise Mertens
DeepSeek V3
Elise Mertens
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Elise Mertens
Claude Haiku 4.5
Elise Mertens
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c52b2caea4256248…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 29 · 01:20 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Total sets · Total games
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 3. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 3, in this order): h2h | totals_sets | totals_games
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 32269,
"sport": "tennis",
"venue": null,
"league": "Abierto GNP Seguros",
"starts_at": "2026-08-29T01:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 29 Aug 2026 01:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Nikola Bartunkova",
"home": "Elise Mertens"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Surface is paramount — weigh each player's record and movement on THIS surface (hard/clay/grass), not their overall ranking.",
"Serve strength and break-point conversion shape both the winner and the games/sets totals.",
"Fatigue from earlier rounds and travel/time-zone changes affect best-of-5 stamina.",
"Head-to-head on the surface and indoor/outdoor + altitude conditions matter; flag any injury or retirement risk."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_sets",
"totals_games"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.